Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts) Mon Jun 6, 2016, 07:40 PM Jun 2016

Could be a bogus ploy....

Just saying SDs commit to the candidate...not a media outlet...

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could be a bogus ploy.... (Original Post) beachbumbob Jun 2016 OP

maybe its a sandedrs plot to make things "messy" lol nt msongs Jun 2016 #1

Never under estimate a desperate campaign... beachbumbob Jun 2016 #2

Am I having a stroke or are you being especially cryptic?! Rose Siding Jun 2016 #3

Nah, they're not going to call it unless they're sure. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #4

Paranoia is so weak. Truly. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #5

msongs

(70,175 posts)

1. maybe its a sandedrs plot to make things "messy" lol nt

Reply to beachbumbob (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 07:42 PM

Jun 2016

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)

2. Never under estimate a desperate campaign...

Reply to msongs (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 07:43 PM

Jun 2016

Rose Siding

(32,623 posts)

3. Am I having a stroke or are you being especially cryptic?!

Reply to beachbumbob (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 07:54 PM

Jun 2016

TwilightZone

(28,833 posts)

4. Nah, they're not going to call it unless they're sure.

Reply to beachbumbob (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:05 PM

Jun 2016

We knew that a bunch of the SDs were going to switch. The AP just found them before they went public with it.

Pretty sure it's nothing nefarious. Just go along with it and enjoy.

Maru Kitteh

(29,087 posts)

5. Paranoia is so weak. Truly.

Reply to beachbumbob (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:09 PM

Jun 2016

Be gone with this.

Reply to this discussion