Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SharonClark

(10,323 posts)
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:24 PM Jun 2016

Andrea Mitchell on Rachel Maddow

Mitchell is whining about the AP and NBC News declaring Hillary the presumptive nominee because it will confirm for Sanders and Sanders fans who think the system is rigged. I wish she would just go away.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Andrea Mitchell on Rachel Maddow (Original Post) SharonClark Jun 2016 OP
She's been a hater for years. She's one of their worst realmirage Jun 2016 #1
I'm sure it's only because Mrs. Greenspan had hoped to vote for Bernie in the GE. teamster633 Jun 2016 #2
So the news is AP Her Sister Jun 2016 #3
And, note to BS staffer: polls are less important than votes! The Dem spooky3 Jun 2016 #4
He's getting on my last nerve LoveMyCali Jun 2016 #7
Yes! I just heard her doing Bernie's whining FOR HIM. She is sickening. skylucy Jun 2016 #5
Well? otohara Jun 2016 #6
Yes, she is a messenger for Sanders. SharonClark Jun 2016 #9
Why On Earth Would Andrea Mitchell otohara Jun 2016 #13
Well, no. After she reported the news (no prob with that) she went on and on skylucy Jun 2016 #16
On And On? OMG Can We Not Handle otohara Jun 2016 #20
I agree with you on that. And the funny thing is that I don't think the pundits are skylucy Jun 2016 #22
And in 24 hours, he would be acknowledging that she won? Princess Turandot Jun 2016 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author sister_rosa_refried Jun 2016 #8
Please don't use that type of language in this Group. William769 Jun 2016 #10
Not cool. Please consider deleting this comment. DawgHouse Jun 2016 #11
I haven't heard that word since I was in the 6th grade...Isn't that a skylucy Jun 2016 #12
Uh Oh. Is is that bad of a word? See...Some of us have led skylucy Jun 2016 #14
Google is your friend. William769 Jun 2016 #15
OK. Will I lose my innocence if I google it? skylucy Jun 2016 #18
Well---Never too old to learn something new. Interesting though that there were two definitions. skylucy Jun 2016 #19
The Media IS Rigged, Andrea and you know.. quit trying to Deflect.. you're doing it poorly. Cha Jun 2016 #21

spooky3

(36,204 posts)
4. And, note to BS staffer: polls are less important than votes! The Dem
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:30 PM
Jun 2016

Voters have spoken and will speak tomorrow and next Tuesday.

LoveMyCali

(2,033 posts)
7. He's getting on my last nerve
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:31 PM
Jun 2016

I tuned in because I knew Hillary was interviewed today not to hear this sniveling weasel.

skylucy

(3,854 posts)
5. Yes! I just heard her doing Bernie's whining FOR HIM. She is sickening.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:31 PM
Jun 2016

And she also is full of it. What she was saying didn't even make any sense.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
6. Well?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:31 PM
Jun 2016

In Bernie world this just confirms their distrust - hatred of DNC, media.

This is not good, not at all.

Quit trashing Andrea Mitchell - she's just the messenger.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
13. Why On Earth Would Andrea Mitchell
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:39 PM
Jun 2016

be a messenger for Sanders?

Jesus have you all forgotten who she's married to?
Who on MSNBC is the messenger for Hillary?

skylucy

(3,854 posts)
16. Well, no. After she reported the news (no prob with that) she went on and on
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:42 PM
Jun 2016

about how that makes Bernies case that "the system is rigged". How does that even make sense?

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
20. On And On? OMG Can We Not Handle
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:50 PM
Jun 2016

Andrea Mitchell stating the fucking obvious?

The Sanders are not happy, neither is Hillary.

skylucy

(3,854 posts)
22. I agree with you on that. And the funny thing is that I don't think the pundits are
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:15 PM
Jun 2016

very happy either. What are they going to talk about all day tomorrow? Kind of spoils the "suspense " that the networks build up to ramp up the ratings. I think you misunderstood what we were dissing Mitchell about. She reported the news because she was told to by NBC. That wasn't what annoyed us. It was her "commentary" after that that annoyed us.

Princess Turandot

(4,824 posts)
17. And in 24 hours, he would be acknowledging that she won?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jun 2016

I don't think that his reaction to the news would be any different tomorrow.

My guess is that the statement he released tonight - that Super Ds don't count until the convention - was already prepared for release tomorrow evening.

Response to SharonClark (Original post)

skylucy

(3,854 posts)
12. I haven't heard that word since I was in the 6th grade...Isn't that a
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:39 PM
Jun 2016

word for a guy---Or can it be used for women too? Andrea Mitchell is definitely one though.

skylucy

(3,854 posts)
14. Uh Oh. Is is that bad of a word? See...Some of us have led
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:40 PM
Jun 2016

sheltered lives and don't even know what it means.

skylucy

(3,854 posts)
19. Well---Never too old to learn something new. Interesting though that there were two definitions.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:50 PM
Jun 2016

One was the nasty one but the other was "An obnoxious person". Hmmmm. Oh well.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Andrea Mitchell on Rachel...