Warren Is Top V.P. Pick for Clinton Supporters, Gingrich for Trump
From: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-06-15/national-poll-part-2-vps
More than a third of likely voters backing Democrat Hillary Clinton in the latest Bloomberg Politics national poll say she should pick Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, a darling of the party’s liberal wing, as her running mate.
*****
Warren received support from 35 percent of Clinton’s supporters in the poll. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey and U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro are the only two other Democratic names to break into double-digits among six tested.
*****
Men and women look at the question differently, and not in a way that might be expected, the poll shows. A majority of men, 55 percent, say the nation is ready to elect two women to the nation’s top jobs. It’s women who are skeptical, with a majority of 59 percent saying that the nation isn’t ready.
= new reply since forum marked as read
At least for me, no one on that list but Elizabeth Warren brings a sense of excitement and pizzazz!
Franken could, any of the others could be strategic and "lords in waiting," but Warren brings the juice!
What a ticket that would be! 
I think the Senate needs Elizabeth.. and Mass has a repub Gov now.
I think the Hispanic leaders would generate excitement.. at least with me. 
And you know what I say to that, Cha?
Vive La Différence! 
This choice will be about Hillary's vision and unity of the Party and America!
Elizabeth Warren would be the boldest, most aggressive, most unifying choice possible!
Warren staying on the sidelines, either as a candidate or a Bernie supporter, did Hillary a wealth of good!
If an unknown democratic socialist could give our nominee a run - and an unknown first-term senator could beat our nominee - I, for one, am so glad we have Warren's endorsement and entrance into the battle NOW! 
It's a matter of having experienced sexism enough in one's own life to be skeptical that a majority of the country would be willing to vote for two women to lead the country. I seem to recall that many Black people also had similar misgivings about Obama's candidacy in its early days.
But people just love sexist stereotypes. It can't be that women have completely rational and reasonable concerns about things. It must be that women just hate other women. 
59% of women say we are not.
There appears to be a gender-issue, but not the one you suggest. 
But that's all right! Castro is a nice, safe, strategic choice. Kind of iffy on experience to be president, but VP would give him experience. Over eight years!
And who have they been polling to come to that fallacy? Disgruntled BS followers and Trumpsters with a handful of Hillary supporters tossed in as an afterthought?
You're right about Castro being a "nice, safe, {and} strategic choice". He is all those things, and as for experience, well, he's been working hard on creating strong bonds with congressional Democrats these past few years and, to be honest, no matter how much experience a politician has, they'll never be experienced enough to be a president or vice president - with Hillary being an exception since, well, her husband was president and she was there right beside him.
The two top positions in our executive branch normally require on the job training. But thanks to having been FLOTUS for eight years, Hillary Clinton has more than enough experience for two while Julian Castro has proven to be a quick learner. So that "lack" of experience on his side doesn't bother me. I'm more interested in knowing what he can bring to the ticket - Texas, perhaps, and LOTS of newly registered Latinos who'll get excited about the prospect of one of their own being this close to the presidency. At this point, it's all about the votes.
suggesting a new House Unamerican Committee. 
