Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
20 replies, 2583 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can you even believe this? (Original Post)
Rose Siding
Jun 2016
OP
I'll watch Rachel tonight. She invested lots of time in these clinic stories.
Rose Siding
Jun 2016
#19
Ari Melber: SCOTUS ruling sets strongest pro-choice precedent in a generation
Rose Siding
Jun 2016
#4
And we got this Today too!: Court upholds reach of US gun ban for domestic violence
Her Sister
Jun 2016
#12
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)1. THAT WAS EXCITING AND ELCTRIFYING!!!!!
William769
(55,818 posts)2. I know right? Blue has always been my favorite color!
Cha
(305,406 posts)3. What a day.. and those two look and sound fabulous!
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)5. To see them over that chryon title just blows my mind!
Cha
(305,406 posts)6. It's Brilliant!
Kath1
(4,309 posts)16. That is beautiful!
An omen of what is to come, I hope!
Stand with Texas women.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)19. I'll watch Rachel tonight. She invested lots of time in these clinic stories.
I've read that this decision is going to come into play for all the states that used the ALEC basis for anti-choice legislation. Maybe she'll get into that.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)20. I hope she will.
This is such great news. I just want to know if it will come into play for all ALEC states.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)4. Ari Melber: SCOTUS ruling sets strongest pro-choice precedent in a generation
MSNBC's chief legal correspondent-
Ari Melber: SCOTUS ruling on abortion restriction access sets strongest pro-choice precedent in a generation
https://twitter.com/mmfa/status/747451394899189761
https://twitter.com/mmfa/status/747451394899189761
Kath1
(4,309 posts)17. Beautiful!
A wonderful day for women's rights!
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)7. K&R!!!
sheshe2
(87,490 posts)8. Wow!
What a great day for women!
Awesome!
UtahLib
(3,180 posts)9. Awesome women and awesome ruling!
DemonGoddess
(5,123 posts)10. K&R!
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)11. That pic so needs to go viral.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)12. And we got this Today too!: Court upholds reach of US gun ban for domestic violence
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/court-upholds-reach-of-us-gun-ban-for-domestic-violence/ar-AAhFKKH?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court is upholding the broad reach of a federal law that bans people convicted of domestic violence from owning guns.
The justices on Monday rejected arguments that the law covers only intentional acts of abuse and not those committed in the heat of an argument.
The case involved two Maine men who said their guilty pleas for hitting their partners should not disqualify them from gun ownership.
The dispute drew interest from advocates for victims of domestic abuse who say the law applies to reckless behavior as well as intentional misconduct.
Gun rights groups argued that the men should not lose their constitutional right to bear arms because of misdemeanor abuse convictions.
A federal appeals court ruled against the men.
The justices on Monday rejected arguments that the law covers only intentional acts of abuse and not those committed in the heat of an argument.
The case involved two Maine men who said their guilty pleas for hitting their partners should not disqualify them from gun ownership.
The dispute drew interest from advocates for victims of domestic abuse who say the law applies to reckless behavior as well as intentional misconduct.
Gun rights groups argued that the men should not lose their constitutional right to bear arms because of misdemeanor abuse convictions.
A federal appeals court ruled against the men.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)13. Whoa! That one needed its own crawl at the bottom of the screen
Gonna need bigger tvs
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)14. Today must've been Woman's Day
or something! What a great way to start the week!
Kath1
(4,309 posts)18. A beautiful way to start the week!
Love it!
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,165 posts)15. K&R nt