Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire
Source: Vox
Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire
Unions might not be the tech giants biggest labor threat.
By Jason Del Rey@DelRey Jun 17, 2022, 7:00am EDT
Amazon is facing a looming crisis: It could run out of people to hire in its US warehouses by 2024, according to leaked Amazon internal research from mid-2021 that Recode reviewed. If that happens, the online retailers service quality and growth plans could be at risk, and its e-commerce dominance along with it.
Raising wages and increasing warehouse automation are two of the six levers Amazon could pull to delay this labor crisis by a few years, but only a series of sweeping changes to how the company does business and manages its employees will significantly alter the timeline, Amazon staff predicted.
If we continue business as usual, Amazon will deplete the available labor supply in the US network by 2024, the research, which hasnt previously been reported, says.
The report warned that Amazons labor crisis was especially imminent in a few locales, with internal models showing that the company was expected to exhaust its entire available labor pool in the Phoenix, Arizona, metro area by the end of 2021, and in the Inland Empire region of California, roughly 60 miles east of Los Angeles, by the end of 2022. Amazons internal report calculated the available pool of workers based on characteristics like income levels and a households proximity to current or planned Amazon facilities; the pool does not include the entire US adult population.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.vox.com/recode/23170900/leaked-amazon-memo-warehouses-hiring-shortage
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)CurtEastPoint
(19,179 posts)DBoon
(23,052 posts)Maybe give them breaks, allow them time off, etc.
AkFemDem
(2,176 posts)And thats why increased pay hasnt reduced worker problems. The issue is Amazons worker productivity over everything else philosophy which has led to miserable and untenable working conditions. Just throwing more money out isnt going to resolve their woes or worker conditions.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Improving working conditions and better pay go hand-in-hand.
I didn't mean to imply they don't need to do both ... although if you pay people $30/hr instead of $15/hr, they're gonna put up with more shit to make that money.
So it becomes a balancing act for them to some degree. Some of each will likely be necessary, I concur
But since this is a localized analysis specific to 'where they need workers', with parameters involving distance from facilities, etc? I'd argue that the most important factor in expanding the radius away from your facilities from which workers are willing to come and work (and thus the population of potential workers) ... is probably most directly tied to 'what are you paying me to commute that distance all the time'? With 'conditions' being a close second.
MHO.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)Ollie Garkie
(199 posts)I know who is under 40 and not college educated has done a stint at the local amazon warehouse. The turnover is insane. MBAs seem to not know math. You cannot always assume the potential labor pool is infinite
Response to Eugene (Original post)
MichMan This message was self-deleted by its author.