Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(103,451 posts)
Tue Dec 26, 2023, 08:28 AM Dec 2023

Labor News & Commentary December 19, 2023 Biden administration requires project labor agreements


https://onlabor.org/december-19-2023/

By John Fry

John Fry is a student at Harvard Law School.

n today’s news and commentary, USW opposes the sale of US Steel; the Ninth Circuit rehears a challenge to AB 5 in California; and the Biden administration requires project labor agreements on federal infrastructure projects.

The United Steelworkers have announced their opposition to the proposed sale of former industry leader US Steel to Nippon Steel, a Japanese company. Earlier this year, US Steel rejected a buyout offer from a domestic competitor which had the union’s support. Politicians from both parties, including rust belt Senators J.D. Vance and John Fetterman, have vowed to block the acquisition. Opponents argue that the deal will lead to further offshoring of blue-collar jobs and threaten national security by reducing domestic steel-producing capacity. However, Nippon Steel has stated that all union contracts will continue post-merger.

The Ninth Circuit will rehear a challenge to AB 5, a California law that makes it difficult for gig companies to classify workers as independent contractors. The application of AB 5 to many gig companies is currently on hold, pending a California Supreme Court case about Proposition 22, an industry-backed ballot initiative that passed in 2020. However, legal battles are still raging over AB 5. Most recently, a Ninth Circuit three-judge panel had allowed an equal-protection challenge on the grounds that AB 5 unfairly targeted the business model of companies like Uber and Postmates. Yesterday’s decision to rehear the case en banc vacates that decision.

FULL story at link above.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Labor News & Commentary D...