Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Ronald Reagan Has Shaped U.S. Labor Law for Decades
https://onlabor.org/ronald-reagan-has-shaped-u-s-labor-law-for-decades/
January 4, 2024
By Andrew Strom
As we enter a Presidential election year, its a good time to think about how Presidents affect workers rights. As we get closer to the election, I will remind everyone how bad Donald Trump was for workers, and when I do that, its worth noting how long the lingering effects of an anti-worker President can last. Ronald Reagan famously broke a strike by the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO) in 1981 when he issued an order to fire the 11,000 striking federal employees. Many people view that decision as a symbolic turning point for the labor movement in the U.S. But, whats less talked about is how Reagans appointees to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have made a lasting impact on labor law.
Before Reagan became President, the five members of the NLRB tended to be career government lawyers. Reagan broke that mold by stacking the Board with individuals who had spent their careers representing management. The Reagan NLRB aggressively reversed precedents, and narrowed workers rights, and workers are still feeling the effects of a number of key decisions made by the Reagan appointees. This is largely due to agency norms that have only been eroded in recent years. In litigation before the Board, the NLRBs General Counsel controls the theory of the case, and prior to the Trump Administration, the General Counsel wouldnt authorize a complaint if conduct was lawful under existing precedent. The Boards current General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, still adheres to that practice. While she has argued that the Board should reconsider some anti-worker precedents, she will not authorize a complaint where the employer has not committed any violation under current Board law. Moreover, since these cases have been followed for forty years, they have acquired an air of legitimacy that presents an additional obstacle to overruling them.
In 1984, in Rossmore House, the Reagan NLRB announced a new test for determining when it is illegal for an employer to interrogate open union supporters regarding their union sympathies. Previously, the Board had held that questioning union supporters about their reasons for supporting a union was illegal unless the employer had a legitimate reason for asking the questions and gave an assurance against any reprisal. The Reagan Board replaced this rule with a totality of the circumstances test that generally allows employers to interrogate open union supporters. Forty years later, this is still the operative test, and employers regularly rely upon Rossmore House to justify asking workers about their support for unionization. For instance, in Bozzutos Inc. v. NLRB, the Second Circuit overruled a divided Board and held that an employers questioning was not illegal where the employers Vice President stopped a worker and asked him, Whats going on with this union stuff? The worker responded, Im not going to talk about it with you, Mr. Clark. To the Board majority, the workers response showed that he was uncomfortable with the questioning. But, the Second Circuit judges disagreed to them, the workers deflection of the question showed there was no coercion.
To me, whats notable about the Bozzutos case is how much time and money was spent litigating whether the interrogation was coercive. The Second Circuit judges devoted many pages to a discussion of five different factors, including whether the worker was an open union supporter at the time of the questioning, and whether the employer had already committed unfair labor practices by the time of the questioning or whether those unfair labor practices occurred days later. The Board majority had cited more than twenty cases that supported its ruling the Second Circuit decided all were distinguishable. Back in 1965, Henry Friendly, a widely respected federal judge, explained the problem with the Rossmore House approach an agency receiving thousands of charges each year shouldnt be forced to determine every instance of alleged unlawful interrogation by an inquiry covering an employers entire union history and his behavior during the particular crisis and to render decisions having little or no precedential value since the number of distinct fact situations is almost infinite. Yet, forty years later, were still stuck with the Rossmore House multifactor test, and as a result, workers often only learn that they were subjected to illegal interrogation years after the fact.
FULL story at link above.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 543 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ronald Reagan Has Shaped U.S. Labor Law for Decades (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Jan 2024
OP
Lemonwurst
(327 posts)1. Important history
Thank you Omaha Steve, for this level of detail and context.
I often wonder at how different the USA wouldve been with a 2nd Carter term, or at least a President Al Gore. By the time we got to 2016, so much damage had already been done, the pattern had calcified that we as a nation would continue to collectively destroy ourselves. I didnt want to believe it, still dont, but time and again I see too many whose emotions override their senses to the point of self-destruction.
Ironically, the worst offenders are those whose lives would benefit most by a strong labor position. But as a group, they just cant get their shit together - they always need their enemies, and ultimately that blinds them.