Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(103,449 posts)
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 04:01 PM Feb 2024

Labor News & Commentary February 25, 2024 Swedish economists debate Tesla's anti-collective bargaining stance & more


By Gilbert Placeres

Gilbert Placeres is a student at Harvard Law School.

n today’s news and commentary, Starbucks challenges the constitutionality of the NLRB, Swedish economists debate Tesla’s anti-collective bargaining stance, and Gina Carano alleges Disney and Lucasfilm illegally retaliated against her for voicing her political views when they fired her from “The Mandalorian.”

Starbucks has joined SpaceX, Trader Joe’s, and Amazon as prominent employers who are responding to charges of labor law violations by challenging the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Board. The coffee giant made these arguments at the end of a February 17 brief in an ongoing case involving four Phoenix-area stores. It argues that (1) the NLRB’s structure violates separation of powers by mixing executive and judicial functions and limiting presidential removal of Board members as well as that (2) administrative law judges within the NLRB are excessively insulated from Presidential removal. Starbucks did not expound much on these arguments – they make up only about one page of the nearly 200-page brief. Starbucks Workers United lambasted this position from their employer, saying that the company has “aligned itself with billionaire class union busters” to push “an extreme and radical position to attack the agency that’s holding it accountable for its historic lawbreaking.”

These arguments are some of the same ones made by SpaceX, Trader Joe’s and Amazon, as John has written. He will continue covering these arguments in our Tracking Attacks on the NLRB series.

In the Wall Street Journal, German Bender responded to Lars Jonung’s arguments that Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s refusal to bargain with Swedish unions is a welcome challenge to the power of labor there and could reinvigorate liberal freedoms, particularly a right of individual contracting. Bender writes that, actually, Swedes support the Tesla workers’ strike by a three-to-one ratio, Sweden has one of the most peaceful labor markets in Europe, and its system of coordinated wage bargaining has benefitted workers while also boosting competitiveness. He argues that “You can have the cake and eat it too. Sweden is one of the world’s least unequal countries but is also regularly ranked among the world’s most innovative, competitive and economically free nations (often beating the U.S. by wide margins).” If Musk wants to do business in Sweden he should adapt to its rules and norms, Bender concludes.

FULL story here: https://onlabor.org/february-25-2024/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Labor News & Commentary F...