Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Labor News & Commentary March 31, 2024 California considers a "right to disconnect & more
https://onlabor.org/march-31-2024/
By Otto Barenberg
Otto Barenberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
In todays news and commentary, a federal judge rejects Teslas motion to dismiss an EEOC race discrimination lawsuit; a new OSHA rule empowers workers in safety inspections; and California considers a right to disconnect.
In a decision released on Friday, a Northern District of California judge denied Teslas motion to dismiss an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit alleging racial harassment and retaliation at its Fremont, California facility. The N-word and other racial slurs, epithets, and stereotyping permeated Teslas Fremont Factory, the complaint claims, as did racist graffiti evocative of lynchings. The complaint further asserts that Tesla retaliated against Black employees who reported harassment by subjecting them to internal disciplinary procedures, reassigning them to less desirable roles, and firing them altogether. The judge found that the EEOCs complaint alleged sufficient facts to state a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while rejecting Teslas arguments that the EEOC failed to engage in pre-suit conciliation and that parallel state court proceedings require a stay of federal litigation. The EEOC lawsuit comes on the heels of an April 2023 federal jury award of $3.2 million to Tesla employee Owen Diaz for substantially similar claims of racial abuse at the Fremont factory.
On Thursday, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) promulgated a final walkaround rule that empowers workers to authorize non-employees, including union affiliates, to accompany and advise OSHA inspectors. Non-employee representatives must be reasonably necessary to ensure an effective and thorough inspection, a requirement satisfied by language skills or expertise with workplace hazards. OSHAs guidance suggests that representatives can wear clothing indicating their union affiliation but may be prohibited from discussing issues unrelated to the inspection with workers. SEIU Local 32BJ President Manny Pastreich praised the new rule, which will take effect on May 31: We commend President Biden for putting the force of law and the power of OSHAs authority behind the workers right to choose their own representative, thus ensuring a fair and accurate inspection takes place. However, a federal court challenge is likely. The Chamber [of Commerce] is considering all options, including litigation, Marc Freedman, the Chamber of Commerces vice president for workplace policy, told Bloomberg News.
Finally, a new California bill would give employees the legal right to ignore communications from their bosses during non-work hours. Assemblymember Matt Haney, who proposed the legislation, took inspiration from France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, and Australia, which have all taken substantial steps towards enshrining a right to disconnect. The California bill would require employers to limit off-hour communications to emergencies or urgent scheduling changes, and the state labor commission would impose fines on employers after three violations. Theres an availability creep that has reached into many peoples lives, and I think its not a positive thing for peoples happiness, for their well-being, or even for work productivity, Assemblymember Haney told the New York Times.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 762 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post