Labor News & Commentary August 6, 2024 Samsung workers on strike return to work after struggling to reach a deal & more

[Omaha Steve]

https://onlabor.org/august-6-2024/

By Sunah Chang

Sunah Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.

In today’s news and commentary: Kamala Harris picks Tim Walz as her running mate, a Missouri bank joins in on constitutional challenges to the NLRB, and Samsung workers on strike return to work after struggling to reach a deal.

Kamala Harris has tapped Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to serve as her running mate for the 2024 presidential election, a vice presidential pick that many unions are poised to approve. In late July, over two dozen Minnesota-based labor leaders sent a letter to Vice President Harris recommending that she pick Tim Walz as her running mate. Last week, UAW President Shawn Fain expressed support for Governor Walz during an interview with CNN. This morning, the president of the National Education Association released a statement celebrating Vice President Harris’s decision to pick Governor Walz, who worked as a teacher before his political career.

Walz has shown a pro-labor stance during his tenure as Minnesota governor. Last October, he joined the picket line at a Stellantis facility in Plymouth in support of the striking auto workers. And last summer, Minnesota passed a sweeping labor bill, which mandates paid sick days, prohibits noncompete agreements, increases funding for safety inspections, among other reforms. However, as Greg reported last May, Walz has previously taken a shaky stance toward rideshare companies, vetoing a bill that would have guaranteed a minimum wage for ride-share drivers and created other protections.

FNCB Bank, a small bank based in Missouri, is the latest company to file a constitutional challenge against the NLRB. More specifically, FNCB Bank’s lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, argues that the protections shielding NLRB members and administrative law judges from removal violate the Constitution. The lawsuit relies heavily on Jarkesy v. SEC—a Fifth Circuit decision that held that the SEC’s removal protections for administrative law judges were unconstitutional.

FULL story at link above.