Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 05:32 AM Jun 2014

The New Ground-Based Defense Missiles Cost $40 Billion That We Could Use For A Lot of Other Things.

http://www.commondreams.org/further/2014/06/16-1



The New Ground-Based Defense Missiles Cost $40 Billion That We Could Use For A Lot of Other Things. And They Don't Work.
by Abby Zimet
06.16.14 - 10:10 PM

A decade after it was declared operational for bogus political reasons - "you just needed to build them" - the $40 billion Ground-based Midcourse Defense System, or GMD, "cannot be relied on," says a blistering report from the L.A. Times. It has an "abysmal" record: It has failed more tests than it has passed, has "performed less well than people had hoped," has been hyped by U.S. officials who claimed it was more reliable than it was, has failed tests far less stringent than real-life scenarios would be, and over time has continued to perform worse, not better, despite years of tinkering, failing five of its last eight tests. It was also designed for a threat that likely doesn't exist, or in the immortal words of Charles Pierce, "not to defend ourselves against missiles but, rather, as a platform for international dick-waving." Oh yes, and members of Congress - the guys who battled over how much to cut food stamps - want a bunch more.



--



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Poverty»The New Ground-Based Defe...