Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumUS air force avoids PFAS water cleanup, citing supreme court's Chevron ruling
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/12/air-force-epa-water-pfas-tucsonUS air force avoids PFAS water cleanup, citing supreme courts Chevron ruling
EPA says Tucsons drinking water is contaminated but air force claims agency lacks authority to order cleanup
Tom Perkins
Mon 12 Aug 2024 07.29 EDT
The US Air Force is refusing to comply with an order to clean drinking water it polluted in Tucson, Arizona, claiming federal regulators lack authority after the conservative-dominated US supreme court overturned the Chevron doctrine. Air force bases contaminated the water with toxic PFAS forever chemicals and other dangerous compounds.
Though former US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials and legal experts who reviewed the air forces claim say the Chevron doctrine ruling probably would not apply to the order, the militarys claim that it would represents an early indication of how polluters will wield the controversial court decision to evade responsibility.
It appears the air force is essentially attempting to expand the scope of the courts ruling to thwart regulatory orders not covered by the decision, said Deborah Ann Sivas, director of the Stanford University Environmental Law Clinic.
Its very odd, she added. It feels almost like an intimidation tactic, but it will be interesting to see if others take this approach and it bleeds over.
more
(Isnt there a movie scene where the attorney dares the corporate poison polluter to take a drink of the water.)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 494 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US air force avoids PFAS water cleanup, citing supreme court's Chevron ruling (Original Post)
cbabe
Aug 12
OP
It appears the end game is for a few to accumulate all the power & wealth no matter the cost to everyone else. -nt
CrispyQ
Aug 12
#4
CincyDem
(6,917 posts)1. I believe that's Dark Waters.
Story about a local attorney who took on DuPont for 10-15 years to make this a public health issue.
CrispyQ
(38,138 posts)2. The movie is "Erin Brockovich."
What did people think was going to happen? I think rich people think they live far enough from areas where things like this happen so they won't be affected, forgetting that everything's connected. What goes around comes around.
cbabe
(4,108 posts)3. My cynical response is: their kids will get cancer just like our kids. This is
so hurtful.
What confuses me is: what is their endgame. You cant eat or drink or breathe bitcoins no matter how many you have.
CrispyQ
(38,138 posts)4. It appears the end game is for a few to accumulate all the power & wealth no matter the cost to everyone else. -nt
cbabe
(4,108 posts)5. Reminds me of a friend who said they'd run to the woods when things got bad. Well, the woods have burned down. Not to
mention micro plastics and viruses in the fish and animals and water and air.
A fat wallet wont save you.
CrispyQ
(38,138 posts)6. "No matter how cynical I get, I can't keep up." -Lily Tomlin