Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Brenda

(1,331 posts)
Tue Sep 17, 2024, 03:33 PM Sep 17

The Promise and Challenges of Managed Retreat

Frankly I'm surprised that South Carolina has a plan like this. Finally! Some acknowledgement of the dire straits we're in! The feds no doubt have some plans but all coastal states better be building their own.

South Carolina is facing the reality that in some areas, managed retreat may be the only option. A 2023 resilience report found that the state may need to buy out and tear down roughly 700,000 flood-prone homes.

South Carolina is one of the few states with a dedicated climate resiliency office and a plan for adapting to climate change. In some coastal areas, the state is offering to help homeowners move by buying out homes from residents living in floodplains and turning the land into green space better adapted to absorbing and retaining water.


Managed retreat strategy or policy is the idea that instead of hunkering down, we will move back away from the coasts. The most equitable way to do that, when some people can’t afford to just up and move, is to have a kind of buyout.

The state or federal agency offers homeowners some kind of amount pegged to the value of their home, to buy their home from them so that they can relocate somewhere more inland.


Looks like it was resident Melissa Krupa who kick-started this process.

SHAILER: Melissa is a real force of nature. When I first spoke to her, it was kind of at the tail end of a six-year battle for her. First to get a buyout and then to get the state to actually demolish her home like they promised. I’ve got a clip from Melissa talking about what she went through:

“In 2016, my house flooded with three-and-a-half feet of water in my house,” Krupa said. “I did start to remodel and rebuild, and then in 2018 I lost my house again to flooding—five-and-a-half feet of water. At that time I realized I had to do something; I couldn’t keep rebuilding. I didn’t want to live in flood waters, and I knew I had to do something for me and my community because we kept losing our house. Some people in my neighborhood who are closer to the water lost their house like 10 times. That’s when I decided to start speaking up.”


https://insideclimatenews.org/news/14092024/managed-retreat-promises-and-challenges/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Think. Again.

(18,500 posts)
1. I'm also surprised that South Carolina is being so proactive and progressive about this too...
Tue Sep 17, 2024, 04:11 PM
Sep 17

My initial thought was this might turn out to be an easy playing field for scammers to buy the flooded, bought-out houses cheap and resell them at market value.

And I guess I was right but I'm glad to see the original flood victims are standing strong and working to protect the rest of the community from that.

Brenda

(1,331 posts)
2. Exactly right. The Flipper Realtors bought out and resold
Tue Sep 17, 2024, 04:20 PM
Sep 17

to unsuspecting buyers, over and over. Of course the fuckin government had a big hand in that by not requiring the Flipper Realtors to report ALL history of flooding for that property not just the flooding in the 3 months that they owned it.

This is very good news to me. A lot of people in this SC situation are most likely hard core MAGA. But over the last few years they've witnessed with their very own eyes what the climate change "hoax" can do to their home and neighborhood.

hunter

(38,989 posts)
3. In a world where secure comfortable housing was abundant and guaranteed for all...
Wed Sep 18, 2024, 09:33 AM
Sep 18

... people whose homes were wiped out by global warming could easily move elsewhere and start again.

I don't think the person who loses a 5 million dollar home to the sea has any more right to our tax dollars than a homeless person.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Promise and Challenge...