Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumLiving On Earth: Climate Goal in Trouble
https://loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=24-P13-00044&segmentID=1Climate Goal in Trouble
Air Date: Week of November 1, 2024
The UN says the current plans of nations to reduce global warming emissions would result in a destructive three degrees Celsius of warming above pre-industrial levels, far higher than the 1.5 C goal set by the Paris Climate Agreement. Bob Berwyn of Inside Climate News joins Host Jenni Doering to discuss the widening gap between these plans and the ambition thats needed to prevent catastrophic climate impacts.
As the world prepares for the UN climate treaty summit COP29 in Azerbaijan, a trio of scientific reports is warning that we are headed for a destructive three degrees Celsius of warming above pre-industrial levels. Thats a far cry from the 1.5 degrees Celsius goal set by the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015. With 1.3 degrees of average warming so far, our planetary fever is already spawning more catastrophic storms, heat waves, and sea level rise. To meet the Paris goal, the world needs to cut global warming emissions by nearly half by 2030, and so far, we are way off track. The continued burning of fossil fuels and the destruction of forests now has global warming gas emissions higher than ever, and the current plans of the 198 nations in the treaty add up to only a paltry reduction of 2.6 percent. Bob Berwyn who follows climate negotiations for our media partner, Inside Climate News, is here and he explains whats required to meet Paris.
BERWYN: The annual reductions needed now are about 7.5% a year, and we're very far away from that. And each year that it doesn't drop, that percentage cut gets bigger and bigger, so we're sort of slipping away. And actually, one of the most interesting things in the three reports was a comment from senior United Nations officials who acknowledged, one of the first times that I've seen it in writing from the UN, that the 1.5-degree goal may not be reachable.
DOERING: Well, this 2.5% projected emissions reduction by 2030 it's where the world is headed collectively. But to what extent are certain countries pulling more weight here? Who is actually on track to make the most impact?
https://megaphone.link/LOE4769297765Air Date: Week of November 1, 2024
The UN says the current plans of nations to reduce global warming emissions would result in a destructive three degrees Celsius of warming above pre-industrial levels, far higher than the 1.5 C goal set by the Paris Climate Agreement. Bob Berwyn of Inside Climate News joins Host Jenni Doering to discuss the widening gap between these plans and the ambition thats needed to prevent catastrophic climate impacts.
As the world prepares for the UN climate treaty summit COP29 in Azerbaijan, a trio of scientific reports is warning that we are headed for a destructive three degrees Celsius of warming above pre-industrial levels. Thats a far cry from the 1.5 degrees Celsius goal set by the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015. With 1.3 degrees of average warming so far, our planetary fever is already spawning more catastrophic storms, heat waves, and sea level rise. To meet the Paris goal, the world needs to cut global warming emissions by nearly half by 2030, and so far, we are way off track. The continued burning of fossil fuels and the destruction of forests now has global warming gas emissions higher than ever, and the current plans of the 198 nations in the treaty add up to only a paltry reduction of 2.6 percent. Bob Berwyn who follows climate negotiations for our media partner, Inside Climate News, is here and he explains whats required to meet Paris.
BERWYN: The annual reductions needed now are about 7.5% a year, and we're very far away from that. And each year that it doesn't drop, that percentage cut gets bigger and bigger, so we're sort of slipping away. And actually, one of the most interesting things in the three reports was a comment from senior United Nations officials who acknowledged, one of the first times that I've seen it in writing from the UN, that the 1.5-degree goal may not be reachable.
DOERING: Well, this 2.5% projected emissions reduction by 2030 it's where the world is headed collectively. But to what extent are certain countries pulling more weight here? Who is actually on track to make the most impact?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 3700 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Living On Earth: Climate Goal in Trouble (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Nov 7
OP
CrispyQ
(38,410 posts)1. And American voters just dealt another blow.
It's hard not to feel that any chance we had at real change is now gone with Trump & a republican run government.
OKIsItJustMe
(20,937 posts)2. It's not much comfort, but...
If we had a chance of arresting the progression of climate change I think we lost it with the election of Ronald Wilson Reagan.
https://www.nrel.gov/about/history.html
1974
In October, President Gerald Ford establishes the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) and signs the Solar Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration Act, which creates the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI).
1977
In February, President Jimmy Carter tells the nation how critical SERI's work will be to his administration's goals: "We will emphasize research on solar energy and other renewable energy sources."
1980
SERI's budget increases from $90 million to $130 millionestimated to be more than all other nations' combined spend on renewable research. The staff grows to nearly 1,000.
1981
President Ronald Reagan slashes the SERI budget to less than $30 million and reduces its staff to 450 people; Director Denis Hayes resigns.
SERI relies on spending earmarks from congressional supporters to fund its work.