Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"A Master Class In Greenwashing" - Coca-Cola's Pledges On Reuseable Packaging Disappear As It Moves Goalposts Yet Again
Coca-Cola has been accused of quietly abandoning a pledge to achieve a 25% reusable packaging target by 2030 in what campaigners call a masterclass in greenwashing. The company has been previously found by researchers to be among the worlds most polluting brands when it comes to plastic waste.
In 2022, the company made a promise to have 25% of its drinks sold in refillable or returnable glass or plastic bottles, or in refillable containers that could be filled up at fountains or Coca-Cola freestyle dispensers. But shortly before this years global plastics summit, the company deleted the page on its website outlining this promise, and it no longer has a target for reusable packaging.
Instead, its packaging targets now say it will aim to use 35% to 40% recycled material in primary packaging (plastic, glass and aluminum), including increasing recycled plastic use to 30% to 35% globally. Its previous goal promised to use 50% recycled material in our packaging by 2030.
EDIT
Campaigners have called on companies such as Coca-Cola to move from recycled plastic targets to reusable bottle targets, because it is single-use items that are the problem, and recycled single-use items still end up polluting the environment most of the time. Cokes latest move is a masterclass in greenwashing, ditching previously announced reuse targets, and choosing to flood the planet with more plastic they cant even collect and recycle effectively. This only reinforces the companys reputation as the worlds top plastic polluter, said Von Hernandez, the global coordinator of the campaign group Break Free from Plastic. If they cant even keep their low-bar commitments, how can they claim to be serious about addressing the global plastic crisis?
EDIT
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/dec/03/coca-cola-accused-dropping-reusable-packaging-target
NNadir
(34,841 posts)Comparatively Coca Cola is somewhat amateurish.
The hydrogen scam, since it destroys exergy, will and has increased fossil fuel sales. Coca Cola is just trying to maintain sales.
OKIsItJustMe
(21,016 posts)When my father was a young man, he drove a delivery truck for Coca-Cola. People paid a deposit on the bottles, and received that deposit back when they returned the bottle. The bottles were taken back to the bottling plant, washed, refilled and put back into circulation. Dad was paid 1¢ for every bottle of Coca-Cola he delivered, and ½¢ for every empty bottle he brought back to the plant.
Molded into the bottom of each bottle was the name of the city where the bottling plant was that had first put that bottle into circulation. (A bottling plant would occasionally order a shipment of custom-made heavy glass bottles, to replace ones which, for whatever reason had not made it back to the plant.)
There was a game children would play with their Coca-Cola bottles, comparing the city names, to see whose bottle had come the furthest. (Coca-Cola promoted this game.)
Now, obviously, just because Coca-Cola could do something like that ¾s of a century ago is no reason to believe they could do it today. We simply dont have the technical know-how that they had back then (Imagine! wooden crates! Heavy glass bottles! Trucks that go to and from the bottling plant! automated bottle washing equipment!)
Oh, its all lost technology! Like the technologies of Atlantis!