Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
2. One would hope so, but Nissan is behind the market on Hybrids
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 11:37 PM
Dec 2013

They made the Leaf EV, of course, but they have very little experience with hybrid drives. They made some specialty hybrids in the Infinity division, but they are just now shipping what I'd call a regular consumer product with the 2014 hybrid Pathfinder. Early reviews are not very flattering regarding driveability, and they only improved MPG by 20%. Nobody else is doing much better on SUV-sized vehicles. Almost all of them are under 30 MPG. The Ford Escape is rated a little over 30.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
3. Yes they are behind, unfortunately so is the car company I buy from.
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 11:39 PM
Dec 2013

I love Subaru's but they have one model right now that is a hybrid, I will really be considering it next time I buy so hopefully they get it together!

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. That is an interesting Fortune article you cited
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 11:54 PM
Dec 2013

here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/11301193

I had not read that. I had no idea the Nissan taxi plan was going up in flames. It struck me as strange that any jurisdiction would build a plan that called for only one qualified supplier.

Yes, I really wish Subaru were much farther along. We have owned several Subarus before we switched to Priuses. It is disappointing that after all this time, their first hybrid would be so unimpressive. It is hard to go back to around 30 MPG when you have been getting about 45. I understand that the Subaru vehicle is designed for more utility and less fuel economy, but it really should do better than that at this stage of vehicle evolution.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
5. The fortune article is from October I think...?
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 11:59 PM
Dec 2013

The whole plan going up in flames has been unreported IMO but I understand why it is somewhat of an embarrassment to NYC.

In regards to Subaru's I have owned two. The first was a 1996 Subaru Legacy which I just got rid of two years ago, it was funny because that car got 26 MPG and when I got my new 2012 Legacy the marketing said it should get about 33 MPG but in reality I get about 30. For me getting 45 MPG would be insane... I really love the reliability so it works for me but only my next purchase I will consider MPG more seriously.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
6. Right and there were Hondas getting nearly 50 MPG 30 years ago
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 09:36 AM
Dec 2013

Toyota tapped into the market segment that really cares about this. Everybody else is just giving lip service, IMHO. (Honda has been a serious player.)

The bottom line is that the thing that actually moved car companies to improve their fuel economy was the increased CAFE standards. The idea the the invisible hand of the market will drive this is preposterous. Americans are short-term thinkers. Most of them will not look at a vehicle that costs $1500 more even if it will save them $4000 in fuel because it doesn't save them the fuel this week, and they really don't feel any personal responsibility for the impact we have on our environment.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
8. The real world forces tough decisions
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 02:26 PM
Dec 2013

and many of them are not in our best long-term interests. We have to keep nudging the industry along. We can't expect the market to do it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»New hybrid taxicabs for L...