Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
You’ve got $50 billion for transit. Now how should you spend it?
from the Transport Politic:
[font size="1"]» Metropolitan Seattle plans to offer its voters the chance to fund a large new transit expansion program. But are the projects chosen for initial funding the right ones?[/font]
Building a regional fixed-guideway transit network is no quick or easy feat, at least in the United States in our era of high costs and relatively slow construction timelines. Seattles first light rail line was funded by voters in 1996 but didnt open its first section for thirteen years; the full extent of the initial line just opened last month, a full twenty years later.
Despite the slow pace, residents of big cities across the country are hungry for more, hoping to spread the benefits of rapid transit to other parts of their respective metropolitan areas. That impulse motivated Seattle residents to approve the $18 billion Sound Transit 2 package (named after the regional transit agency) in 2008, which will extend Link light rail north, south, and east, creating a 50-mile light rail network by 2023.
It has also encouraged Sound Transit to propose a third package of projects, expected to be submitted for voter approval this November. Sound Transit 3 (ST3) would support $50 billion in investments, to be completed by 2041.
Excitement about adding light railand the region does apparently want it, given the massive ridership produced by the opening of new stations last monthhas nevertheless been countered by skepticism about the value of the draft ST3 plan put forward by the transit agencys planners and leaders.
Their questions are relevant to any region thats considering major new transit expansion projects: If the projects the plan includes arent ideal, are they worth paying for? If the projects are built in the wrong order, are the links scheduled for the back of the line worth waiting for? ..............(more)
http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2016/04/06/youve-got-50-billion-for-transit-now-how-should-you-spend-it/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1667 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You’ve got $50 billion for transit. Now how should you spend it? (Original Post)
marmar
Apr 2016
OP
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)1. We're doing the same thing here in $iliValley, but we only get $6 billion
from a half-cent sales tax on the November ballot.
http://www.envisionsv.org/challenge
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)2. Well, I'd probably fly first class more often.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)3. steel on steel