Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(136,595 posts)
Thu Feb 22, 2018, 03:56 PM Feb 2018

Two possible routes chosen for high-speed maglev train linking Baltimore to DC.

'A federal review has narrowed the possible routes for a proposed high-speed, magnetic levitation train linking Baltimore and Washington down to two.

Both routes more or less track the Baltimore-Washington Parkway. A route that would have run along the heavily developed Penn Line operated by Amtrak has been dropped.

The proposal calls for using maglev technology on a 40-mile (64 km), $10 billion line where trains could reach 375 mph (603 kph), reducing the trip between the two cities to 15 minutes. Most of the route would be underground. Some communities along the proposed paths are opposed.

The Washington Post reports that project proponents hope a route can be chosen and tunneling could begin in 2020. Operations could begin in 2027.'

http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-maglev-routes-20180213-story.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two possible routes chosen for high-speed maglev train linking Baltimore to DC. (Original Post) elleng Feb 2018 OP
$10 billion to reduce the one way trip time to 15 min lapfog_1 Feb 2018 #1
Agreed- even with a new ROW, conventional rail with multiple units makes far more sense friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #2

lapfog_1

(30,225 posts)
1. $10 billion to reduce the one way trip time to 15 min
Thu Feb 22, 2018, 04:04 PM
Feb 2018

what would the cost be and the trip time with a surface route using modern rail technology and faster trains (say a top speed of maybe 150mph) ?

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
2. Agreed- even with a new ROW, conventional rail with multiple units makes far more sense
Thu Feb 22, 2018, 04:36 PM
Feb 2018

*for the uninitiated, 'multiple unit' means that each car has its own motor or motors.*

They are used all over the world, and are pefectly suitable for a +/- 40 mile route with no
grade crossings. A plus is that equipment can be swapped with extant lines, if necessary.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»Two possible routes chose...