Honolulu’s Rail Project Back in the Crossfire This Fall

[marmar]

from the Transport Politic blog:



Honolulu’s Rail Project Back in the Crossfire This Fall




In 2008, Honolulu’s citizens approved the construction of a new high-capacity rail line that would provide quick public transportation along the city’s coastline. The $5.3-billion, 20-mile project is one of the largest in the nation, but it is backed by a steady source of local revenues and the almost definite promise of a federal New Starts capital grant that will cover about a third of costs. Moreover, it has held the support of the city’s leaders consistently since 2005, when pro-rail Mayor Mufi Hannemann entered office. The project broke ground last year.

After the mayoral primary earlier this month, however, the project’s future is decidedly up in the air. Current mayor Peter Carlisle, a major supporter of the project, received only 23% of the vote and will not make it to the second round. On the other hand, former Hawaii Governor Ben Cayetano received 45% of the ballot; he has made his opposition to the rail project one of the primary arguments of his campaign; he has promoted the implementation of a bus rapid transit system instead. In the second round this November, Cayetano will face former city manager and rail supporter Kirk Caldwell, who received 29% of the vote.

Caldwell faces an uphill climb in his effort to convince the city’s citizens to vote for him and keep the rail project going. Not only did he receive a small percentage of the vote (though the low primary turnout might be a factor), but the city council is wavering on its support for the line. A lawsuit raising questions over environmental reporting is in court this week. The rail line’s elevated guideways — which have been a point of criticism for the project for years — continue to raise public fears about the project’s suitability to the city’s natural beauty. And recent polls have showed than about half of the population thinks the program should be stopped.

Mayor Carlisle, now a lame duck, says he will “do everything [he] can to get rail far enough along so that it cannot possibly be stopped,” but Cayetano election would certainly raise questions about whether the line has the local support necessary to finalize federal grants — particularly if anti-rail former Governor Linda Lingle becomes the state’s newest U.S. Senator this fall. Cayetano claims that he will use construction contract termination clauses to cancel the program. The whole situation is a reminder of the paralyzing indecision and backtracking that too often marks U.S. politics. Will Honolulu’s rail project replicate the story of the ARC tunnel, New Jersey’s new rail connection to New York that was cancelled in 2010 by Governor Chris Christie after construction had begun? ......................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2012/08/18/honolulus-rail-project-back-in-the-crossfire-this-fall/

[KamaAina]

1. I still can't understand why they chose heavy rail over light rail

on the mainland, the major obstacle to light rail is the rule that light rail tracks can't cross heavy rail tracks. That means lots of expensive elevated structures and underpasses. But on O'ahu, there is no heavy rail. Also, the metropolitan population of ~900,000 would seem to be a bit small for heavy rail, even factoring in a large number of tourists (excuse me, I mean "visitors" ).

Oh, right. The heavy rail firms put on a full-courrt lobbying press to the City Council.

[razakhan]

2. View profile Honolulu’s Rail Project Back in the Crossfire This Fall

thanks you for this awesome news