Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Decline In Hunters Threatens How U.S. Pays For Conservation
https://www.npr.org/2018/03/20/593001800/decline-in-hunters-threatens-how-u-s-pays-for-conservationA new survey by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shows that today, only about 5 percent of Americans, 16 years old and older, actually hunt. That's half of what it was 50 years ago and the decline is expected to accelerate over the next decade.
Meanwhile other wildlife-centered activities, like birdwatching, hiking and photography, are rapidly growing, as American society and attitudes towards wildlife change.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1879 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Decline In Hunters Threatens How U.S. Pays For Conservation (Original Post)
Beringia
Feb 2019
OP
Wow. You would think that in a country with more then 393 million civilian owned firearms, there
CentralMass
Feb 2019
#2
underpants
(186,691 posts)1. Virginia's Game and Inland Fishery is fully self funded
No money out of the general fund
CentralMass
(15,539 posts)2. Wow. You would think that in a country with more then 393 million civilian owned firearms, there
would be more hunters.
BigmanPigman
(52,269 posts)3. Damn good point!
exboyfil
(18,004 posts)5. I think we benefit from the irregular distribution of guns
Probably better for a person to have 10 guns than ten people have 1 gun each.
2naSalit
(92,752 posts)4. Policy change could fix that.
Many conservation groups have, for years, made proposals to shift the funding so that they can participate in the agency policies like hunters get to. But noooo, can't do that, then they would be able to actually do something significant in the way of conserving nature rather than exploiting it all the time and only allowing the exploiters to have a say in policy matters.
Beringia
(4,575 posts)6. Yes, I was just going to post on that
I went to DNR (hunters) meetings in Madison Wisconsin in 2006 and 2007. Two citizens made proposals to have a fee for general public so they can have more say in management of wildlife and the resolutions failed.
2naSalit
(92,752 posts)7. It's a major issue
here in the Rockies.