Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumThings Are Changing. Democrats are becoming Pro-Palestinian.
Last edited Wed Mar 23, 2022, 09:03 AM - Edit history (1)
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-joe-biden-only-on-ap-middle-east-government-and-politics-8417ab720a42826a5e14f2dd31ff4fc8WASHINGTON (AP) A new poll on American attitudes toward a core conflict in the Middle East finds about half of Democrats want the U.S. to do more to support the Palestinians, showing that a growing rift among Democratic lawmakers is also reflected in the partys base.
The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds differences within both the Democratic and the Republican parties on the U.S. approach toward Israel and the Palestinians, with liberal Democrats wanting more support for the Palestinians and conservative Republicans seeking even greater support for the Israelis.
The survey also examined Americans opinions on the Biden administrations handling of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. The survey was conducted about three weeks into a cease-fire following a devastating 11-day war last month between Israel and the Gaza Strips Hamas militant rulers. The fighting killed at least 254 Palestinians and 13 people in Israel.
Among Democrats, 51% say the U.S. is not supportive enough of the Palestinians. The sentiment jumps to 62% among Democrats who describe themselves as liberal.
I have always had strong feelings in support of Palestine. In the articles I'm reading, this is true for a growing minority of African-Americans, especially those who identify with Black Lives Matter activists.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/05/30/black-lives-matter-palestine-history-491234
The violence that erupted in Israel and Palestine this spring has activated a powerful sense of solidarity among many African-Americans. Well-known Black public figures, from Brooklyn Nets point guard Kyrie Irving to actress Viola Davis, have been outspoken in support of Palestinians. Black Lives Matter activists have played an active role organizing and promoting pro-Palestinian protests all over the country. A Black Lives Matter organizer in New Jersey summarized the movements sentiments by saying, we know occupation, we know colonization, we know police brutality.
I think, when I read about what was happening, what is happening, I definitely think "police brutality". And it angers me.
However, I'm also VERY angry at the quickness I am seeing to silence those who are Pro-Palestinian. Especially those who would suggest that being Pro-Palestinian is ***automatically*** anti-Semitic. I read a recent OPINION PIECE about the Israeli position toward Palestinians, and it was so hostile and so unfair, I had no words. Six no's.
No two-state solution, no one-state solution. No negotiations. No end to settlement. No Palestinian Sovereignty in Jerusalem. No refugee return.
Now, this is an opinion piece, so it's possible that these things are not firm positions.
https://www.usip.org/publications/2022/02/israeli-palestinian-conflict-danger-no-solution-messaging#:~:text=Israel's%20%E2%80%9CSix%20No's%E2%80%9D,and%20no%20peace%20with%20Israel.
It is the sheer ugliness of this position that makes me want the US to take action against Israel. Stop sending them money and weapons. Invoke sanctions.
I would also like to see Palestine recognized as a nation by the UN.
Tetrachloride
(8,454 posts)1. Gaza Strip. (south of Israel on the Mediterranean, with southern borders with Egypt)
2. West Bank
3. citizens inside Israel
4. Palestinians outside of the first 3
I have read Wiki recently. The leadership of West Bank vs Gaza are at odds.
Not all Egyptians are willing to discuss Palestinians calmly. I recently brought the topic up and was quickly rebuffed without completing 3 sentences, much less my first question.
So,
in conclusion, not a homogeneous group.
Yeah, its not much. Nevertheless, I have sources who I can chat with
if I know what to ask.
As economic and natural resources are getting thin here, some issues are going to arise from dormancy.
The old guard of staunchly pro Israel is not the same as pre Internet days
Mosby
(17,495 posts)It's an opinion piece, which omits numerous salient facts regarding the conflict to create the authors narrative.
The author is trying to create a non existent parallel (because he made it up) to the 3 no's of Khartoum, a resolution the Arab league passed in 1967 after their war of genocide failed against the Israelis. It states:
No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel.
This is the position today with many Middle East states, including the Palestinians for the most part.
qwlauren35
(6,278 posts)I will make some edits to my note.
However, I would like to know - are any of these positions that are suggested actually false? Are any of these positions actually "yes's"?
Israeli
(4,306 posts)Over here it is called " The Status Quo ".
Ref : https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-the-deception-and-the-myth-of-the-status-quo-1.10155018
Its not just that a status quo always perpetuates a power balance. In contrast to prevailing opinions that it freezes time, it also allows the side that profits from it to deepen the arrangement that benefits it, and to promote it, while the losing side is limited in what it can do. Israelis are well aware of this when, in the name of the status quo, they are deprived of the use of public transportation on Shabbat, but they prefer to forget the concept when it comes to Israels polices in the occupied territories.
For many years now the preferred government policy toward the Palestinians has been to maintain the status quo, without the headache of negotiations and breakthroughs; maintaining what already exists, and thats all. Military occupation forever. Benjamin Netanyahu turned this idea into his flagship policy. Naftali Bennett, it now turns out, intends to leverage this approach even more forcefully. In an interview with the New York Times this week, he described how his government would maintain a balance: on one hand not annexing, on the other hand not allowing a Palestinian state to be established.
A freeze that benefits everyone? Certainly not. The situation on the ground serves only the opponents of a two-state solution. Proof of this could be found in Bennetts own words, when he said that along with the supposed freeze, Israel will continue to expand settlements in the name of natural growth. Palestinians allegedly will also be allowed to build in existing towns and villages, meaning Israel will continue its illegal expansion, since that is what already exists, and the Palestinians will remain in their own domain.
The existing situation that allows the deepening of the occupation and a creeping annexation along with an expansion of settlements is in no way the middle ground. The left wing of the coalition knows this full well, but is allowing the perpetuation of this thesis, enabling Bennett to use them as his excuse.
Under the myth/deception of a status quo that is a balanced compromise, manufactured by centrist politics that cleave to an imaginary will of the people, the Bennett government will advance more than ever the perpetuation of the existing situation, entrenching the current balance of power in the territories for generations, making the possibility of a two-state solution more remote than ever and all of this courtesy of its left wing. Because anything new is forbidden by the Torah, the main thing is that the train of peace never passes this way.
Israeli
(4,306 posts)I think things are changing .
See my sig :
Ref: https://www.progressiveisrael.org/the-israeli-left-lives/
We dont define ourselves as " Pro-Palestinian " rather pro Peace .
Without a Two State Solution there will never be peace ,
qwlauren35
(6,278 posts)That's a beautiful paragraph, and I'm glad that your movement exists.
I wonder if the old school will have to die off before peace can be realized.
I know that here in the US, 20 years ago, I thought that the millenials and subsequent generations would end racism. But it hasn't happened, and I am very disappointed. Maybe I just haven't waited long enough. More old-timers, especially in the Senate and positions of power, have to die first.
Israeli
(4,306 posts)They are affiliated with the political party that I support , Meretz .
Ref : https://www.progressiveisrael.org/about-us/history/
Meretz USA was strengthened by a 1997 merger with Americans for Progressive Israel, an organization whose origin dated back to an organization of graduates of the Hashomer Hatzair youth moment in the mid-1940s. API participated in Zionist institutions, raised money for the kibbutz movement and organized community and cultural activities. It established a monthly journal, Israel Horizons.a voice for left-wing Zionists for 59 years until 2011. PPIs current online magazine, under the same name, first appeared in the fall of 2017.
In the early 2000s, Meretz USA collaborated with the Labor Zionist Alliance (today called Ameinu), as well as college-aged members of the two left-Zionist youth groups to create the Union of Progressive Zionists (UPZ). By 2007, the UPZ had chapters at 60 universities and colleges across the United States. In 2009, the UPZ became J Street U.
Partners for Progressive Israel has supporters and partners in many places across the United States. It has board members in California, DC, Florida, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, South Carolina and more. Its national offices are in New York City.
Israeli
(4,306 posts)all of which are against the occupation and for a Two State Solution .
The largest and best known is Peace Now .
See : https://peacenow.org.il/en
The one that I belong to is smaller and not well known outside of Israel , Gush Shalom .
See : http://zope.gush-shalom.org/index_en.html
Plus many other Peace groups/movements :
https://www.theparentscircle.org/en/pcff-home-page-en/
https://www.ir-amim.org.il/en
https://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/
https://www.btselem.org/