The Rafah attack: what the media is not saying.

[Richard D]

[Eko]

1. Not an impartial video.

HonestReporting or Honest Reporting is an Israeli media advocacy group.[1] A pro-Israel media watchdog,[2][3] it describes its mission as "combat[ting] ideological prejudice in journalism and the media, as it impacts Israel".[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HonestReporting

I have a bit of a question on this. 180 meters is the length of 2 football fields. That is quite a distance for secondary explosions to reach and damage, not impossible but still. One would think that secondary explosions reaching that far would also do damage to other places other than just that one area. Possible. Still. I will wait for independent investigations before coming to a conclusion relying neither on information given by the IDF or Gaza authorities.

[Richard D]

2. Yes. Not impartial . . .

. . . but then neither are any of the reports coming out of Gaza, as all are filtered through Hamas, or are from Hamas.

[Eko]

3. True.

[stopdiggin]

4. I'd like to see more on this

The vid mentions an ammunitions warehouse - then also secondary explosions. Where exactly was the ammo warehouse (in relation to the 'camp')? And was this the intended target? A secondary?

And 2) if the intended strike was as precise, and at a distance from the 'camp' claimed - why was Netanyahu almost immediately calling it a 'mistake' and issuing apology in the aftermath?. Clearly lending itself toward a conclusion - somebody F'd up somewhere ...