Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
Related: About this forumAIA Convention Overwhelmingly Rejects Resolution to Re-Investigate WTC 7
Overwhelming Majority of AIA Delegates Make the
Political Decision and Vote Down Resolution 15-6
We are a professional not a political organization. But in this case, if we vote no on this resolution, we are making a political decision, not a professional one. Thank you very much. Daniel Barnum, FAIA
Those were the closing remarks from the lead sponsor of AIA Resolution 15-6, Daniel Barnum, FAIA. Seconds later, the AIA delegates cast their votes. The unfortunate outcome was that an overwhelming majority made the political decision. Resolution 15-6, which called upon the AIA to support a new WTC 7 investigation, was voted down 3,892 to 160, garnering 4% of the delegates votes.
Political Decision and Vote Down Resolution 15-6
We are a professional not a political organization. But in this case, if we vote no on this resolution, we are making a political decision, not a professional one. Thank you very much. Daniel Barnum, FAIA
Those were the closing remarks from the lead sponsor of AIA Resolution 15-6, Daniel Barnum, FAIA. Seconds later, the AIA delegates cast their votes. The unfortunate outcome was that an overwhelming majority made the political decision. Resolution 15-6, which called upon the AIA to support a new WTC 7 investigation, was voted down 3,892 to 160, garnering 4% of the delegates votes.
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=bcd0bc392b
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 4931 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AIA Convention Overwhelmingly Rejects Resolution to Re-Investigate WTC 7 (Original Post)
William Seger
May 2015
OP
actually its 2354 at present that have signed support for investigating 9/11.
wildbilln864
May 2015
#6
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)1. But, but, but...
Billions of professional architects and engineeers!
What happened to them?
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)2. what are you on about?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)3. I had been told here on DU...
...that an overwhelming number of architects and engineers disagreed with the NIST findings on WTC 7.
I am beginning to suspect that has been exaggerated, if this AIA consensus is any indication.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)4. ah, projecting I see.
It was you that exaggerated with "Billions of professional architects and engineeers! "
who said there were billions where?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)5. How many times have you been wrong about 9/11?
Last edited Wed May 27, 2015, 03:23 PM - Edit history (1)
And has anyone else confirmed you were wrong?
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)6. actually its 2354 at present that have signed support for investigating 9/11.
inaccuracies abound on both sides of the fence.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)7. Gee, I would only have guessed you were wrong once or twice!
Last edited Wed May 27, 2015, 03:23 PM - Edit history (1)
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)8. and you accused others of exaggerating!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)9. Will you continue to be wrong about 9/11?
Last edited Wed May 27, 2015, 03:23 PM - Edit history (1)
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)10. yes! n/t
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)11. Okay, how will I be able to tell when you are posting nonsense?
Last edited Wed May 27, 2015, 03:24 PM - Edit history (1)
zappaman
(20,617 posts)12. Careful....you're getting into math.
Not one of the strong suits I've noticed.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)14. But can he pronounce "Xi"?
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)13. go look. n/t