Creative Speculation
Related: About this forum9/11 - WHO DID IT and HOW : Rebekah Roth talks to Bill Ryan.
Listening to this now myself and thought I'd share here. Are there any flight attendants here?
calikid
(625 posts)Lots of info I hadn't heard before.
William Seger
(11,040 posts)calikid
(625 posts)William Seger
(11,040 posts)She says she Googled "19 arab hijackers 9/11" looking for a Middle Eastern name to use for a character, and up came all this "information" about how some of the hijackers are still alive, that the Saudi government is suing the FBI for stealing the identities of some of their citizens, and that some of the hijackers were professional airline pilots.
She then says that on Day 1, she knew there was no plane crash at the Pentagon; she could see that, and Jamie McIntire said so on CNN. There were "no plane parts there, when there would have been plane parts all over the outside of the building." Furthermore, that section of the Pentagon had just been reinforced with steel and Kevlar, and "an aluminum airplane isn't going to go in there like a missile and leave a hole out the other side of all those rings." And of course, she knew there was no plane crash at Shanksville "because there was no plane crash there."
Every one of those seven claims is bullshit, and if you don't know why, then Google can help you there, too. (If you still need help with any of them, let me know.) I stopped listening there, when she says she paid for a disk drive of FOIA documents to be shipped to her and the postage was $9.11 which she took as a "devine" message of some sort. Woo, she has friends in high places.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)BBC: Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.
The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.
Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco...SNIP
Full Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
Not a shred of evidence that any 9/11 hijackers boarded any planes
By Craig McKee
To believe the official story of 9/11 you have to swallow an awful lot. You have to believe the laws of physics can be suspended for a day, that planes can disappear after crashing, and that Muslims accused of being suicide hijackers can still be alive after the deed is done.
About that last one. Essential to the deception was the premise that 19 Muslim extremists hijacked four domestic flights on the morning of September 11, 2001 with the intention of flying them into predetermined targets.
But do we really know who these alleged hijackers were? Do we know they carried out any hijackings? Do we know they were even at the scenes of the crimes? In fact, as researcher Elias Davidsson demonstrates in his recent book Hijacking Americas Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence, there is not one shred of authenticated evidence that any of the 19 men blamed for the attacks ever boarded any planes. And even if there were, this would not prove they participated in any hijackings.
Davidsson shows that evidence proving that the guilt of the accused hijackers simply does not exist. Beyond that, the names on the official list have changed multiple times with no adequate explanation for why or how. Several accused even turned out to be alive after 9/11, a fact that is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report even though it was known long before the report was written. The North American media have also ignored this critical fact...snip
MORE: https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/03/19/hijackers-did-not-board-planes/
What's in the 28 censored pages? http://28pages.org/
William Seger
(11,040 posts)Roth says "some of the hijackers are still alive," and I think we can be pretty sure that's not true, since none of them bailed out. But saying "hijackers" instead of hijack "suspects" sounds a lot more sinister, doesn't it (although the supposed implication is never actually explained). I'm not really sure why "truthers" are mystified by the existence of other people with the same or similar names, but you do need to catch up on your reading:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_theory_1.html
Anything else I can help you with?
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)These people say she's lying about her history as a flight attendant for a start. Also, Rebekah Roth isn't her real name, but that doesn't mean she's lying about 911. Just another piece of the puzzle. I wondered about this woman from the beginning. Listen to her- she is very... uh... lets just say she's convinced she is right and isn't really interested in much debate. She sounds authoritarian to the max. One of these people claim to have traced her IP to Langley VA. And you know what is in Langley.
Truth Frequency Radio
As Joe Joseph opened last nights Freedom Link Radio with the article by Kurt Haskell, I was pleasantly surprised but not shocked. In that article Haskell outs the former TFR hostess Rebekah Roth as one named Sara. He thoroughly debunks the whole former stewardess/flight attendant cum author on 9-11 and the flights of that fateful day.
We have known for a while that Rebekah Roth is also known as Monika Gainor. After her bad behavior here, she was removed from TFR. What we didnt know until Dr. Fetzer showed it, was that Sara/Rebekah/Monika has an IP address from Langley Virginia, home of the CIA. Now we could leave all there. Or like my mother often said, Leave it where Jesus flung it. I remember this phrase because my mom would say it to me often.
Why? Because I hate sneaks, sneaky people gives me the creepiest crawleys and I have to ferret it out. I always have and I always will. I have learned to accept this fault in myself. So, no, as usual, I will not leave it where Jesus flung it, for now. An associate of mine found some amazing things yesterday, I want very much to give credit to this incredible researcher, but they insist on anonymity, and I must respect that...
http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2015/12/shocking-rebekah-roth-unwigged-cia-ties-exposed-2766550.html
Rebekah Roth's Methodical Deceit - A Real Investigation By Kurt Haskell
REBEKAH ROTH UNWIGGED! Methodical Illusion turned Methodical Deception
More-
https://www.youtube.com/results?filters=week&lclk=week&search_query=rebekah+roth
Jim Fetzer is not to be trusted either, but every once in a while he coughs up something resembling truth. The problem is that you have to verify it. Because a lot of times Fetzer just spews whatever comes into his mind. (Example- "Ron Paul Endorsed Donald Trump"- direct quote. Completely made up BS.) Kevin Barrett fired him from his weekly show "False Flag Weekly News". Personally, I think Barrett is very credible. One of the best voices for 911 truth. But who knows. TRUST NO ONE!
Note to our loyal viewers from No Lies Radio:
If you have been watching our recent shows it is obvious that Kevin and Jim have developed irreconcilable differences and as a consequence things simply blew up: Kevin fired Jim and Jim quit. They cannot work together anymore. Jim is moving on with some new shows of his own. Kevin will continue to anchor False Flag Weekly news with a variety of national and international guest anchors to give brand new perspectives on the news we report. We at No Lies Radio appreciate the service that Jim gave to this show and wish him well with his new shows.
http://noliesradio.org/archives/107938
One thing is for sure- as more people question the official conspiracy theory, more and more people will try to poison the well. The worms have barely begun climbing out from under the rocks.
Well know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.-CIA Director William Casey
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)William Seger
(11,040 posts)In 14 years, the "truth movement" has manifestly failed to come up with enough "truth" to even avoid turning on each other and accusing each other of being "disinfo agents" who are trying to make the "movement" look ridiculous by propounding wacky theories different from their own wacky theories. Like any other religion, the "movement" has splintered into sects, and now the prophets Barrett and Fetzer will take their followers in different directions.
But Roth is a simple case: she's just another conspiracy hustler with books to sell. Hers are novels, but all the others are just a different genre of fiction.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)No. You're going to have to get your own drink.