Brother of 9/11 Victim Hopes to Bring WTC Evidence to Court

[JohnyCanuck]

UK citizen Matt Campbell lost his brother, Geoff, in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

In the ensuing years, Matt has been on a quest to find a route to justice for his brother's murder. He has helped expose the fact that the official story is incontrovertibly wrong — that hijacked planes and fires could not possibly be the sole reason for the destruction of the Twin Towers.

Specifically, he has educated government officials and the media by introducing them to the evidence supporting the theory of controlled demolitions. This evidence has been outlined by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in its documentary, 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out, and in its booklet, Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7. Explosives explain the observed high-speed ejection — outside the footprint of the Twin Towers — of not only structural material, but also the remains of his brother.

Now Matt is pursuing a legal strategy to force a correction to the official story and bring some semblance of justice to his brother.

snip

“The amount of the remains identified for the victims,” Matt says, “showed that for one victim, most of a body was recovered (about 86%), three victims were identified with a much smaller range of recovered body material (2-3%), and six people had so little remaining body material that the amount of identified remains was rounded to zero percent recovered (0%) and a DNA match was the only way to prove a victim’s identity. This is an interesting range of percentages.”

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/252-news-media-events-brother-of-9-11-victim-hopes-to-bring-wtc-evidence-to-court.html

[William Seger]

1. Slight problem with that plan: AE911truth is a fraud

... which spends almost all of its money on two things: Supporting Richard Gage and raising more money. You won't accept that, but suit yourself. I see wildbill posted Gage's latest video, which is a classic example of the idiotic nonsense he uses to lead people down the garden path into marginalized irrelevance. While it's really sad that a victim's relative fell for it, Richard Gage is losing in his war against reality: There are still no magical silent explosives.

ETA: For the record, I would love to see Gage's "experts" appear as "expert witnesses" in a civil trial, and I'll take short odds on the outcome.

[wildbilln864]

2. No!

The fraudsters are not AE911truth! They are members of the anti-truth brigade which is assigned here. IMHOOC!

[wildbilln864]

3. "There are still no magical silent explosives."

That part is true. But also true is the fact that you are the only one who brings up such nonsense as your straw man to knock down and you still haven't convinced anyone. But I give you this. It's fun to watch you try over and over and over! 2449!

[William Seger]

4. Oh, I'm pretty sure most people get it

... since it's so simple and obvious, and isn't that what's really bothering you? Gage claims that explosives cut thousands of square inches of steel columns and pulverized thousands of square yards of concrete without making enough sound to be heard on any of the videos or enough shock wave to register on any seismograph, and without even enough of a pressure wave to break windows in adjacent buildings. That would require either magic or technology so advanced that it would be indistinguishable from magic. Since most people can see that that's a ridiculously idiotic theory, Gage attempts to prop up it with another equally idiotic theory: magic thermite that can not only melt through steel in a fraction of a second like a cutter charge, but can also somehow keep the steel molten for weeks.

Sorry, wildbill, but the only thing Gage's imaginary physics prove is how gullible his marks are, and his problem remains that only a small percentage of the population is that gullible.

[nationalize the fed]

5. gullible

how gullible his marks are, and his problem remains that only a small percentage of the population is that gullible

Did you believe the official stories about Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch?

Do you believe everything you're told by Anderson Cooper or Rachel Maddow?

USA: a suckers paradise. Ignorance is bliss. War is peace.

Why didn't W want an investigation? Do you think Kissinger was a good choice to lead it, when it was finally ordered?

[William Seger]

6. You seem to be adrift on a sea of confusion

As imperfect as it is, I still prefer evidence-based reasoning over unsubstantiated paranoid speculations -- it has a much better track record. One characteristic that seems to be common to all "truthers" is that they simply don't understand how rational people think. In a nutshell: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Where is it?

[wildbilln864]

8. you seem to be projecting your own situation onto others. n/t

[wildbilln864]

7. no! again you have it wrong!

"Gage claims that explosives cut thousands of square inches of steel columns and pulverized thousands of square yards of concrete without making enough sound to be heard on any of the videos or enough shock wave to register on any seismograph, and without even enough of a pressure wave to break windows in adjacent buildings. "

Nice straw man though.