Creative Speculation
Related: About this forumBolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)It doesn't exclude either possibility, but the article is written from a negligence standpoint.
zappaman
(20,617 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)and they made sure they got it.
I have this vivid memory of seeing my Sen. Dianne Feinstein on either CNN or MSNBC sometime in June before 9/11 -- she was as agitated as I have ever seen her and she was warning about how there was intelligence that an attack was imminent and that there was nothing being by the Administration. That she was there, saying this on the air shocked the shit out of me. It was one of the first things I thought of the day the planes hits.
LIHOP.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)I can't believe even with that evidence, we still have doubters among us. Dead set "terrorist" who didn't fly out of NY even though they planned this for years. LOL! Good terrorist don't need weapons. And this was pre 9/11 so carrying fake plastic dynamite would have been possible. But for some reason flying over 1,000 miles, over military bases, was much safer I suppose. No reconstruction of any kind of the planes. Remember flight 800 to Paris and the hell they went through to get as many parts as they could.
The whole thing stinks.
. .
(54 posts)...behaved exactly as a Secretary of Defense would behave if he were to seek increased death.
100%, step-by-step, exactly as such.