Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 01:30 AM Feb 2015

BBC 11/23/01: Hijack 'suspects' alive and well


A man called Waleed Al Shehri says he left the US a year ago

BBC Sunday, 23 September, 2001

Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.

The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.

Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September. Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.

He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports...snip



...FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt....Continued>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

(Note: An update on this story was published in October 2006 in the BBC News editors' blog)

9/11 conspiracy theory
Friday, 27 October 2006

A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.

The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy.

We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_theory_1.html


The hijack suspects

The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation has released the photos of the suspected hijackers of the four planes seized on 11 September...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1567815.stm

further reading
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/HijackersAliveAndWell.shtml
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BBC 11/23/01: Hijack 'suspects' alive and well (Original Post) nationalize the fed Feb 2015 OP
"The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence..." William Seger Feb 2015 #1

William Seger

(11,040 posts)
1. "The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence..."
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 09:47 AM
Feb 2015

"... that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy."

I would quibble with that statement, in that while I have seen it cited by conspiracists as if it was evidence of something or other, I've never seen any conspiracist actually attempt to present a rational hypothesis or explanation of why they believed it's evidence of a conspiracy. On the one hand, conspiracists claim that the quick identification of the hijackers is suspicious, and yet they turn around and claim that if some of the identifications were wrong, that's suspicious, too -- a fairly common occurrence from people whose "reasoning" works in reverse.

After initial confusion about similar names, there is no evidence that any of the people finally identified as hijackers and shown in that poster is still alive. (In fact, an al Qaeda video titled The Nineteen Martyrs accepts those identifications.) But before going into that long-since discredited claim, how about taking a crack at your own explanation of why you think it matters: Do you take the story "as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy," and if so, why?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»BBC 11/23/01: Hijack 'sus...