"They're trying to normalize sin"

[lambchopp59]

Here we go again. "xtians" got their panties in a bunch over a 3 second same sex marriage scene.

8https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-ad-that-launched-a-crusade-conservative-christian-moms-target-turbotax/ar-AA166I4E?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=19c1910e56c94796a0273c02239f58d6&ei=31

It's got me motivated to poll LGBT and allies something:
I've often been turned off by instances that assume an audience is not only heterosexual, but male horn-dog appeal.
A lot of popular entertainment used to be really, really idiotically presumptive about that

1 vote, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	I get the squemish heebee jeebies myself when heterosexist "humor" assumes an audience is hetero, likely male horn-dog
	0 (0%)
	It only bothers me when it's blatantly anti-LGBT
	1 (100%)
	Doesn't bug me.
	0 (0%)
	I'm a heterosexist dipshit that is uncomfortable with any depiction outside of heterosexual assumptions
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[bucolic_frolic]

1. No sin, no need for a Savior.

Kind of defeats their whole trauma bond schtick, no?

[Effete Snob]

2. Depends on the couple

I get more squeamish when the couple is mismatched, regardless of their orientation.

Going by movies where there is, for example, a repellent male star who is inexplicably the object of attraction by "introducing" whatshername. I assume the production was a vehicle for him to try to get laid.

The apotheosis of the genre being, say, Last Tango in Paris.