LGBT
Related: About this forumClarence Thomas & Samuel Alito want to end marriage equality & they won't stop there
Thomas never should have been placed on SCOTUS with his reputation.
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2020/10/clarence-thomas-samuel-alito-want-end-marriage-equality-wont-stop/
The concerns being raised over the recent Thomas-Alito Manifesto (which will occasionally be referred to as a dissent to the cert denial in Davis v. Ermold) are well-founded.
Should Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito find three seat-holders of like prejudices, Obergefell v. Hodges will disappear as Supreme Court precedent.
Anyone who has any doubt about that should seek an objectivity check.
Despite being the end result of institutionalized privileging of marriage equality by cis gays over the more pressing needs of more LGBTQ people than will ever make direct use of the 2015 decision, the existence of Obergefell v. Hodges is a good thing. And its erasure will be a bad thing.
And it will be just the beginning.
Permanut
(6,636 posts)Start with Loving.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Irish_Dem
(57,316 posts)They're special.
MadameButterfly
(1,690 posts)So Loving is safe. And he won't see the irony.
eppur_se_muova
(37,388 posts)Debilitating enough to remove them from the bench, but not so debilitating that they can't watch what happens when Biden gets to appoint a couple of judges ...
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Skittles
(159,240 posts)my dear friends Curt & Brian, who have been married almost 33 years.....it pains me to think there are people who don't think their union is valid, and that it is not equal to other marriages......Clarence and Samuel are ugly, sickening people who have no business being on the Supreme Court