Access to Family Planning Takes on New Urgency in a Post-Roe, Hotter World

[niyad]

Access to Family Planning Takes on New Urgency in a Post-Roe, Hotter World
7/10/2022 by Phoebe Barnard and Carter Dillard


In a concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the same legal reasoning behind overturning Roe v. Wade should be used to reconsider rulings protecting same-sex marriage, gay sex and contraception. (Bryancalabro / Wikimedia Commons)

As we near World Population Day, observed each year on July 11, the Supreme Court’s overturning of abortion rights has the chilling effect of casting a shadow over the right to contraception and family planning services. The global population is approaching 8 billion—but now, efforts to slow population growth (and the consumption burden that comes with it) are under a new cloud. As the dissenting justices pointed out, “The right to terminate a pregnancy arose straight out of the right to purchase and use contraception.” The Court’s decision hinged on privacy rights which underlay reproductive rights—and thanks to the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, privacy rights are now in doubt.

We undermine family planning at our peril. It’s one of the most powerful tools we have for achieving sustainable development and a sustainable population. It creates more economic returns than virtually any other investment and was a major factor in cutting fertility rates in half over the last 50 years. Since population growth stokes climate change and other environmental and social pressures, Paul Hawken’s Drawdown ranked family planning and empowering women and girls among the most effective long-term climate solutions. Closing the education gap between girls and boys in low- and middle-income countries could help slow population growth, reduce wasteful consumption by hundreds of gigatons and lower greenhouse gas emissions by over 50 gigatons by 2050.
. . . . .




Outside the Supreme Court after the decision on Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, a June 2016 Texas abortion case. (Adam Fagen / Flickr)



Social movements like BirthStrike seek to empower women to influence future social, environmental and economic conditions by refusing to procreate. Women in leadership roles can take that influence further and help balance multiple goals in society, including a habitable planet and a baseline level of resources for children. To achieve them, we’ll need to put voluntary limits on how many children we choose to have. Discourse about this among young women is emerging fast. So are efforts to reform education laws to prioritize teaching and learning about the dimensions of reproductive choices, sustainable family sizes, and empathy and justice for future generations. Some argue that those that gained immense wealth from the current economic system while imposing great costs on future generations, like fossil fuel companies, give some of it back to fund initiatives to create greater equity for future children.

But meanwhile, public policy on reproductive choice and population growth lags way behind such ideas, and in the U.S. even family planning itself is in the crosshairs. We can’t afford that in the 21st century. We need to envision and build a society where young people are empowered to make conscious reproductive choices, including support for delayed childbirth, small families well-raised and life paths that don‘t include parenting. As the population and consumption levels mount, our planet is more threatened than many of us are willing to contemplate. But we must face up to how reproductive decisions threaten our common future. Empowering people to make them responsibly will protect future generations in ways that other approaches have failed to do.

https://msmagazine.com/2022/07/10/supreme-court-post-roe-family-planning-climate-change/