Feminists
Related: About this forumDoes anyone else go to work sick?
Which Side Are You On? Activists Launch "Women for Paid Sick Days" Campaign to Press Mayoral Candidate Christine Quinn
http://www.alternet.org/story/156391/which_side_are_you_on_activists_launch_%22women_for_paid_sick_days%22_campaign_to_press_mayoral_candidate_christine_quinn/
<snip>
Women Working Sick
Nearly 1 million New Yorkers don't get paid sick daysmost are women working in low-wage service jobs like waitresses, retail clerks, day care providers and home care workers, Maria Castaneda, Secretary-Treasurer of 1199 SEIU-UHE told the crowd. For those women, unexpected illness or a child's doctor visit can cost a day's pay or even their jobs.
According to a report by the Community Service Society, more than half of workers who handle food as part of their jobs, and 43 percent of those in close contact with children or the elderly don't get paid sick leave, meaning that when they work sick, they put others at risk as well. Marjorie Hill, CEO of the Gay Men's Health Crisis, pointed out that people with HIV are at increased risk of contracting illness from those around them, and are more likely to face serious consequences as a result, making paid sick days a priority for her organization, and a public health issue that should be of concern to all.
Ai Elo, a restaurant worker with the Restaurant Opportunities Center, works to support her two younger siblings, of whom she has primary custody. She pulled extra shifts to make enough money, but soon began to have knee and back problems. My knees got so bad that I collapsed at work one day while serving a customer. Even then, my boss forbade me from going home until the end of my shift, she said. But as many women workers know, whether they are mothers or like me whether it's because they have primary custody over siblings or other relatives, putting your own health at risk is one thing but putting the health of loved ones at risk is a different story. When a family emergency came up, Elo had to choose family over her job and stayed home, knowing it would cost her.
And yet paid sick days would actually save money for the city. The Institute for Women's Policy Research estimates that workers without paid leave don't see doctors as quickly as they should and wind up more dependent on emergency rooms. If New York City workers got paid sick days, they estimate, nearly 50,000 emergency room visits would be prevented, reducing health care costs by nearly $40 million.
<snip>
I know I have, although fortunately it hasn't ended me up in the ER.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)tell you the number of times he has gone to work sick. He would be so sick he ended up in the ER and then finally out of work without pay for the week. I support ALL and not just one group.
spooky3
(36,217 posts)2) this is a feminists' group -- do you understand what the goals of the group are? &
3) I hope your son did not infect any customers when he went to work sick. If his boss doesn't care about his/her employees, he/she ought to care about customers.
yardwork
(64,417 posts)The purpose of feminism is not to elevate women over men. The purpose of feminism is to achieve equality and fairness for all.
Worried senior
(1,328 posts)with Pneumonia, didn't know at the time that's what I had, knew I was very sick but no sick days, chance of getting fired if I didn't go in.
Luckily I was young enough and fit enough that I recovered but it was hell.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)I've gone in with fever and the flu, but Pneumonia! Holy cow. I'm glad you're alive! It's sick that you'd have to worry about being fired over a life-threatening condition.
REP
(21,691 posts)That was after taking three buses in snow and slush to get there.
Good times.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)She ended up in the hospital and was out of work for six weeks after diagnosed with pneumonia.
You are so fortunate to have recovered. Please don't push yourself so hard in the future. Take care!
Nay
(12,051 posts)assholes, but because I just didn't know what was wrong with me -- WTF am I so effin' tired?), and ended up in the emergency room getting chest x-rays when it got too bad. Not a fun trip in any case, but to have a boss that will fire you for being seriously ill? Jesus.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)than stay home and be miserable and lose a day's pay. That being said, I got a few days of sick pay. But, since I have a chronic condition it wouldn't cover me all the time. So, I would go in feeling like I wouldn't be able to finish my shift. A couple of times I went to work and only made it two hours into my shift. One day I made it through my shift, but had a rather interesting walk home. Interesting in the sense I was very woozy and wobbly and felt like I was going to pass out. I am sure that there are people that have even more severe illnesses that do the same thing and more frequently.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)and I think it would be seriously awful to have to go to work sick.
REP
(21,691 posts)Gone to work with pneumonia, kidney infections, while passing kidney stones, a completely dislocated shoulder and hours after nearly severing my thumb ... and run if the mill flus, necrotizing cellulitis, etc.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)I believe I'd rather risk being fired.
REP
(21,691 posts)Well, I've seen my husband with a cold; I just might believe you.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)I don't know what you mean by "being homeless"?
I've never been homeless.
Response to whathehell (Reply #45)
REP This message was self-deleted by its author.
REP
(21,691 posts)You said you'd rather be fired than go in to work sick. Being fired isn't a trivial thing to many - we use the money we receive in return for doing work to pay for things like food and shelter. Some of these jobs pay so poorly that once rent, the electric bill, the gas bill and the phone bill are paid, food is bought, and transportation is arranged for the month there isn't much, if any, left over to put aside to build that 'three months pay' cushion so recommended. I imagine there's even less money if one is raising children as well.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)felt the need to go to work sick as a dog, I "get it".
I always had my parents, who, though by no means "well off"
did live in a modest little house I could stay at if things got
really tough, so I suppose my situation wasn't as "dire",
as those of some others.
None of this means I'm indifferent to the need for sick leave..Having
to go to work when you are as sick as you've describe is criminal, in my view
Sick leave should be mandatory.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)why did they vote for a contract w/o sick time?
whathehell
(29,804 posts)xmas74
(29,767 posts)If you use more than two sick days in a year you can be suspended for three days. More than five (and that's just one good flu bug) and you can lose your job.
I have nearly a month on the books but can't use them.l
whathehell
(29,804 posts)giving with one hand and taking back with the other.
You may need a union...seriously.
xmas74
(29,767 posts)No one wants to help. I've gone so far as to make contact with a union, have someone come down to speak (repeatedly), etc. They finally gave up on us, since I'm the only one who actually did anything.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)Do you work with a lot of conservatives?
Just wondering.
xmas74
(29,767 posts)I'm a liberal Christian and I've been informed many times that my church isn't really Christian, if that gives you an idea of what I work with. (I'm a Methodist, fwiw.)
They are very conservative, to the point that some of the men have stated that I shouldn't make as much money as they do and that I shouldn't be allowed to supervise them. And those are the American men! (I also work with a number of international students who think even worse things-and say them.)
whathehell
(29,804 posts)Is there any hope of moving away from these folks or this area?
Child custody agreements prevent out of state moves and my child (soon to be a teenager) doesn't want to leave her friends unless we are making a fresh start out of state. She doesn't want to leave this town to move to a rival town or attend a rival school, etc.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)brewens
(15,359 posts)a case of bad timing and stupidity on my part. I'm a mobile drive for a blood center. If I know I'm going to be really sick the next day, I can call in with no problem. The only thing is that the relief driver comes from out HQ 100 miles away. Several times I've talked myself into believing I'm not really getting sick and been stuck when I woke up with a raging cold. Then it's too late and the blood drive will be canceled if I call in. The only choice is to gut it out, treat the symptoms and take every precaution to avoid spreading it. I used decongestants, serious sanitary wipes and hand sanitizer.
Running my dairy route years ago I was in a pickle. Same situation. The relief driver would never make it and I had to deliver milk to the schools. I actually thought I might get into trouble with the school cooks if they realized I had a raging cold. I was new. Before long I realized that at any time during the cold a flu season, almost every school on my route had a cook that was fighting a cold on the job. They could have called in but people just don't do it.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,919 posts)for all workers to be organized (union). I'm in a union and we got management to admit staying home when sick, and getting paid, is better than the alternative...........
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)With the caveat that I'm in a weird donut hole myself...I'm an adjunct teacher in a union and I only get 1 personal day each semester to take off. We don't earn sick time. Being in a union, it's something I'm in a better position to improve, for sure though. But there are lots of adjuncts in the same boat.
Smilo
(1,950 posts)and was sick with a bad cold and then caught another about a month later, so I remained home because hey, it's a hospital and people's immune systems are already comprised - I was threatened with termination for using too much sick leave!
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)That is really awful. You were threatened for doing a good thing!
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Performing, working, and having mouths to feed transformed me from an itinerant free spirit into an obsessively reliable hopeless responsibility freak. What doesn't kill you only makes you stupid stronger.
Back in the day it because I/we desperately needed the money.
Now it's mostly just a disgusting, annoying, silly habit that I can't seem to break, although the free spirit has returned, with several caveats.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)I know this feeling!
I felt guilty at my old job before this one for taking a week off because I'd been bitten by a Black Widow. I still crawled in a bit too soon, unloading kilns and trying to not barf in them. That was a non-profit where I had sick time, but still--the work is there waiting for you, with no one doing it.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)but how many MEN do you know who fit this description?
I know of NONE, but I know of a few women who fit it...
No offense, but I think women are sometimes their own worst enemies...One of the
things women do more than men, for instance, is neglect to delegate...They can
be dutiful little control freaks, always "self-sacrificing" for...Oh hell, I don't
KNOW what for....bragging rights?
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)Although, when they are sick--we don't get the flu like *they* get the flu, lol! http://manflu.info/
It would be interesting to compare though--to see which professions tend to get more lenience in sick-time and what gender they tend to be dominated by.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)Love the "man flu" site, btw!
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)which tends to be a role we socialize women into, as a society.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)with dependent children to care for at home.
So, please, tell me, which child would you have delegated the task of earning the money to pay our rent to -- my 11 yr old, or my 12 yr old? Tough call, I know; but the thing is, somebody's gotta do it, and the kid's lemonade stand went deep into the red during the recession . And it's *sigh* just so hard for us single working parents to find good servant help to delegate tasks to these days. Everyone at the Club has been talking about it. Why, poor Anne Romney has been just absolutely livid over it! (Zorra bats her eyes, flutters her fan, pretends she is "getting the vapors"
Sooo,....I guess that leaves us the dutiful little control freak mom who is working 17/7 plus taking care of her children the best way she knows how, and for what reason?
For "bragging rights"?
"Bragging rights"?? Are. You. Kidding. Me. ?
Or could it possibly have been self sacrificing out of, oh...I don't know...love for her children?
And since when has disgustingly reliable and responsible become "control freak"?
Control is what passive-aggressive people attempt to assert when they don't show up, or show up late, in order to give themselves some pathetic sense of superiority, power, and control over others by making their lives uncomfortable. That'll teach 'em.
Another annoying trait single working parents develop, besides being reliable and responsible, is to be unnervingly direct when confronted with bullshit (especially those single parent feminists, when they are confronted with examples of institutionalized, enculturated sexism)...and, darn, I just can't seem to break this annoying habit, either -
So...in this vein...there is also this in your post, btw:
[font color="red" size="size" face="face"]SEXISM:
Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.[/font]
Your post is, unfortunately, sexist.
One of the
things women do more than men, for instance, is neglect to delegate...They can
be dutiful little control freaks, always "self-sacrificing" for...Oh hell, I don't
KNOW what for....bragging rights?
Seriously? Are. You. Kidding. Me. ?
Sexism, exactly as defined, non?
If I wasn't such a dainty, delicate little lady, I'd totally tell you, bless your heart, to stick your sexist post where the sun don't shine; but I won't, because it's simply not ladylike, and my delicate female constitution simply can't bear the rudeness of it.
And yes, it's very true; I really do stress hard over possibly not being able to honor my word. Not honoring my word fills me with unrelenting remorse, (because, like soooo many other women, I share the inherent stereotypical female characteristic of being a "dutiful little control freak" . It's really annoying to me, sometimes.
But the people on the other end of those commitments always seem to appreciate it; is this where the "bragging rights" thing comes in?
I'm not going to alert on your sexist post, and I make no apologies for being direct and honest. I've already experienced enough unconscious institutionalized sexism (and homophobia and racism)) to last me the rest of my life, and I'm never, ever going to be obeisantly silent when I encounter it.
I got over apologizing in the face of sexism (and homophobia and racism) a long time ago, when I was working 2 gigs with mouths to feed, along with everything that comes with that territory.
Now, you can get angry at me for this seemingly harsh post, or you can run with it, and make an effort to reassess your worldview of women. A lot of men (and more than a few women) don't understand the profound unconscious effect on their belief systems that the institutionalized misogyny inherent within this patriarchal system instills in them.
Think about it.
Please.
On edit: I suspect that the men who fit "that description" are, or have been, single working parents.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)talking about "delegating" housework? .
What I WAS talking about, in fact, was women who work outside
the home who, in those postions, are in a position to
to delegate to adults under their supervision.
As far as this being "anti-feminist", give me a break --It's hardly a
moral failing, for God's sake and there's probably a sociological
reason for it, but the tendency has been observed and commented
upon by women themselves, most of them "feminists"...My own
sister has this tendency in her job and she is actually quite successful,
she just needlessly overworks herself
Too bad you leaped to conclusions, as it makes the above rant,
with all it's accusations about my supposed "sexism"
not only off-point, but almost laughable...I belong to
the History of Feminism group and anyone even REMOTELY familiar
with me, knows me to be one of THE most outspoken
feminists on this board.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)It's just that when I see a post where women are referred to in the context of the stereotypically female category of "dutiful little control freak...self sacrificing...for bragging rights" and who "neglect to delegate, like men delegate", I guess my sexism auto-immune response goes into overdrive. I see "working guy who sits on couch and drinks beer and watches TV while working woman comes home and does everything else and man can't understand why woman is consistently resentful about this and tries to explain why, and has repeatedly tried to delegate minimal domestic work, and guy says "hey I do things around here, I took out the garbage yesterday, so what's your problem? You're trying to control me!" syndrome.
As a woman with two children who has managed a household and been the executive administrator of two small successful, but not overly lucrative, businesses at the same time, one a non-profit, the other self-owned, and then later in life a manager of another non-profit as well, I have a tendency to totally resent the stereotypical "control freak female" label. You simply do what needs to be done, because it needs to get done, and you are ultimately singly responsible for the work getting done, so if someone else can't, or won't, do it, you do it yourself, even if you are ill, because (sometimes helpless) people are depending on you to get it done.
I've had to deal with more than a few men on staff who resented my position of authority because I was female, and who would childishly try to impede my efforts, and I'm sure that I have been labeled as a "control freak" by men both in my home and male staff members as well. (I do not believe that any of the women who worked or lived with me ever considered me a "dutiful little control freak self sacrificing for bragging rights". The younger brother (in his mid 20's) of one of my LTR partners who rented a room in our home actually had the audacity to say to me "Who appointed you God?" after I politely explained to him, while he was finishing scrubbing the cooking surfaces off of my expensive non-stick cookware with a metal scrubber, that doing so would ruin the cooking surfaces, and that that I would appreciate it if he cleaned up his own messes in the house. etc.
Soooo, from experience, I learned that, by only hiring women whenever possible, I no longer had these types of problems, maybe because we has all learned how to be dutiful little self sacrificing control freaks I suppose; anyway, under those circumstances, all the women simply did their job without hitting on each other, or trying to sabotage me, freeing me up to relax because I no longer had to monitor staff, and could concentrate on my primary work, allowing me to vacate my position of Chief Dutiful Little Control Freak Who Self Sacrifices Because The Reality Of The Situation Is That A Deadline Is Looming And She Needs To Complete Work That Failed To Get Done By Petulant, Disrespectful Staff
My children absolutely considered me a "dutiful little self-sacrificing control freak" when they were teenagers. Now that they are grown up, married, one with two children, neither of them even remotely believes that I was/am a control freak anymore. And it appears that I have been fairly successful in getting them to understand why and how to pull their weight so that they don't ever come to view their wives as "dutiful little control freaks self-sacrificing to claim bragging rights".
Now, I do see your point that there are some women who are totally, and needlessly, workaholics. It is regretful that male workaholics are generally positively stereotyped as "admirable, productive, highly respected over achievers", while women who conduct themselves in exactly the same manner as the aforementioned men are generally negatively stereotyped as a "dutiful little control freak self-sacrificing for bragging rights". Both are often heart attacks waiting to happen; the difference is, the man gets respect for earning his heart attack, while the woman is labeled an overbearing, shrewish, self-sacrificing fool for earning hers.
Honestly, I find it distressing that the feminist women you refer to in your post would stereotype workaholic women as "dutiful little control freaks self-sacrificing for bragging rights". I am pretty sure that there are some common sociological reasons behind women becoming workaholics.
Anyway, I sincerely do apologize for misreading your post as sexist; it is true that I am not familiar with you as a frequent poster in Feminist Groups, and because that stereotype/label "dutiful little control freak who refuses to delegate and self sacrifices because of a need to claim bragging rights" basically applies only to women, it totally hit a very, very raw nerve in me. I did not equate someone being "an obsessively reliable hopeless responsibility freak" with women working themselves to death for no good reason. And I have always viewed domestic responsibilities as equal in value and necessity to working within the system, so I do not automatically distinguish these types of work from one another. Again, my bad.
So very sorry. Please forgive me for my unwarranted, rude response. I do hope you can find some understanding, and a bit of empathy, of/for/why/where I was coming from with my misdirected rant, after this reading this relatively deficient explanatory "novel".
whathehell
(29,804 posts)you, and no doubt other women, are very sensitive about.
I can see how it could be seen as offensive, especially with the diminutive "little".
It was a poor choice of words and I shouldn't have used them.
My sincere apologies.
whathehell
(29,804 posts)back at ya
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)I only have a few sick days a year and usually end up using them for when my kids are sick and I need to care for them. But I can't tell work that. They think I should have a sitter ferry my sick kids to the doctor and babysit them.....ha ha ha ha. No one wants to babysit sick kids. And the hassle of authorization to take them to the doctors or give them medication....so unrealistic.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)I know it won't happen, but it should. The caring for kids when they are sick falls on women the most--http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21547885/ns/business-careers/t/female-absenteeism-not-just-about-child-care/
I think that is also why fighting for sick days is a Feminist issue. So many women don't even get sick time, and if they do, often they have to apply it to family needs, and come into work sick anyway. But expansion of Family Leave would really help too, for both genders.
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)so no chance to become Typhoid Mary. When I worked in a building, I would take my sick days, but I only got 4 of them and they "counted against you".
Rex
(65,616 posts)not matter what, those jobs basically had no sick days or any way for me to 'call in sick'. My current job, yeah I can call in sick.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)I have sick time but deadlines don't move and nobody else is going to do the work.
yardwork
(64,417 posts)There are two slightly different problems facing workers in the U.S. One problem faces those who have no paid sick leave. That's a terrible and unfair situation, it's getting worse, and I fully support unions and workers' rights movements. I would prefer to pay more for products and services and know that other people were part of a safety net ensuring their basic human needs, including a living wage and health care benefits. I would prefer to pay slightly higher taxes to expand the safety net. I probably wouldn't even have to pay more if we redistributed some of the wealth that is currently being hogged by the 1% and shared it more fairly among everybody else.
The other problem is the issue of job security. Even for those of us fortunate enough to have jobs with paid sick leave, there's the question of risking your job by taking off time, especially during crunch times at work or if there is an important project it would be unwise to miss. This is the reason many of us take little vacation, work during vacations, and work while we're sick.
The problems are related in that they both stem from an economic environment that puts profits and money ahead of human wellbeing.
liberal N proud
(60,956 posts)I have to throwing up before I will stay home.