Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(42,869 posts)
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 01:24 AM Nov 2020

'The Exclusion of Older Persons From Vaccine & Treatment Trials For Coronavirus,' JAMA Network

- 'The Exclusion of Older Persons From Vaccine and Treatment Trials for Coronavirus Disease 2019—Missing the Target.' Benjamin K. I. Helfand, MSc1,2; Margaret Webb, BA3; Sarah L. Gartaganis, MSW, MPH3...Sept. 28, 2020.

Older adults are at greatest risk of severe disease and death due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Globally, persons older than 65 years comprise 9% of the population,1 yet account for 30% to 40% of cases and more than 80% of deaths.2 Unfortunately, there is a long history of exclusion of older adults from clinical trials. In response, the National Institutes of Health instituted the Inclusion Across the Lifespan policy, requiring the inclusion of older adults in clinical trials.3 Thus, we reviewed all COVID-19 treatment and vaccine trials on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov to evaluate their risk for exclusion of older adults (?65 years).

Methods: Details of our approach, methods, and description of included clinical trials are shown in the eMethods in the Supplement.

Each of the 847 clinical trials was abstracted by at least 1 trained research associate, with reliability checks of all ratings. Age exclusions were identified by viewing all of the eligibility and exclusionary criteria. Specific age exclusions were classified into 5-year categories from ages 55 to 80 years; our focus was on exclusion of the 65 to 80 years age group most affected by COVID-19. Informed consent was waived because all data were deidentified and came from previously published studies.

Results: Table 1 identifies clinical trials by treatment with an exclusion by age. We found large variability in the age exclusions. Among the 847 trials, 195 (23%) included an age cut-off. Table 2 displays indirect age-related exclusions preferentially affecting older adults; each trial could have multiple exclusions. The most common age-related exclusion was compliance concerns (213 trials), and 129 of these were related to consent. Next, were broad nonspecified exclusions, specific comorbidities, requirement of technology, and other reasons. A total of 366 (43%) trials had any exclusions, of which 252 (30%) did not have an age-based exclusion. Combining the results of age-based exclusions (Table 1) and exclusions preferentially affecting older adults (Table 2), 447 (53%) trials were considered high risk for excluding older adults.

In 232 phase 3 clinical trials, 38 (16%) included age cut-offs and 77 (33%) had exclusions preferentially affecting older adults; thus, 115 (50%) were considered high risk for excluding older adults. Of 18 vaccine trials, 11 (61%) included age cut-offs, and the remaining 7 had broad nonspecified exclusions; thus, 100% were considered high risk for excluding older adults.

Discussion: Our findings indicate that older adults are likely to be excluded from more than 50% of COVID-19 clinical trials and 100% of vaccine trials. Such exclusion will limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy, dosage, and adverse effects of the intended treatments. We acknowledge that some exclusions for severe or uncontrolled comorbidities will be essential to protect the health and safety of older adults. However, caution must be taken to avoid excluding otherwise eligible participants for reasons that are not well-justified. A limitation of this study is that we did not conduct detailed review of every study protocol; thus, we were unable to fully evaluate the appropriateness of all comorbidity exclusions...

Read More, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2771091

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'The Exclusion of Older Persons From Vaccine & Treatment Trials For Coronavirus,' JAMA Network (Original Post) appalachiablue Nov 2020 OP
Those who conduct research studies may be biased toward a younger population Eyeball_Kid Nov 2020 #1
Still, one expects that seniors should be the first to be vaccinated question everything Nov 2020 #2
From most of what I've read, the elderly are grouped w health appalachiablue Nov 2020 #4
I'm very concerned as I had Guillain Barre samplegirl Nov 2020 #3
Are u def barred from a Covid vaccine? The sooner the population appalachiablue Nov 2020 #5
the issue is the FALSE SENSE of security with any vaccine and the facts are clear, our data is beachbumbob Nov 2020 #6
I'm checking for a couple relatives with pre existing conditions appalachiablue Nov 2020 #7

Eyeball_Kid

(7,568 posts)
1. Those who conduct research studies may be biased toward a younger population
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 01:38 AM
Nov 2020

because of a fear that more older people will die from being subjected to a vaccine, and they just don't want people to die.

Yeah, it's irrational in a way, but this is a good illustration of how purely rational endeavors can be "tainted" by cultural or moral values, and thus show an imperfection, or bias. And, IMO, it's okay, as long as we are fully aware of the limitations of our actions.

samplegirl

(12,062 posts)
3. I'm very concerned as I had Guillain Barre
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 02:00 AM
Nov 2020

at age 20 now I’m 60 and can’t take the flu shot or shingles shot because of it. I feel like a sitting duck.

appalachiablue

(42,869 posts)
5. Are u def barred from a Covid vaccine? The sooner the population
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 02:08 AM
Nov 2020

is vaccinated, the better for you and others high risk, obviously. I hear your true concerns.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
6. the issue is the FALSE SENSE of security with any vaccine and the facts are clear, our data is
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 07:08 AM
Nov 2020

severely lacking, the clinical trials have been rushed, and safety precautions with masks and social distancing must remain in effect for the coming year or longer. We have NO data on how long and of what type of immunity will exist after 3 months, 6 months, 12 months. I simply will not rush to a vaccine as I and my wife are both high risk. Hell I never got a flu shot until 4 years ago.

appalachiablue

(42,869 posts)
7. I'm checking for a couple relatives with pre existing conditions
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 07:48 AM
Nov 2020

but in good health overall. There's an article about Moderna using subgroups in trials; I just posted it in this section, at least it has something for people in special categories.

Yes, there are still many unknowns, I'm just trying to sort out some of the recent reporting on this nightmare.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»'The Exclusion of Older P...