Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,687 posts)
Tue Jun 20, 2023, 11:11 PM Jun 2023

Missouri judge orders end to GOP officials' standoff over proposed abortion rights ballot measure

Source: Associated Press

Missouri judge orders end to GOP officials’ standoff over proposed abortion rights ballot measure

By SUMMER BALLENTINE
June 20, 2023

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — A constitutional amendment to restore abortion rights in Missouri will move forward after a judge on Tuesday broke a standoff between two Republican officials that had halted the process.

Cole County Presiding Judge Jon Beetem ordered Attorney General Andrew Bailey to approve fellow Republican Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick’s estimated $51,000 price tag on the proposal within 24 hours.

Bailey had refused to approve the price estimate, arguing that if the proposal were to succeed, it could cost the state as much as a million times more than that figure because of lost Medicaid funding or lost revenue that wouldn’t be collected from people who otherwise would be born.

But Beetem said Bailey has “no authority to substitute his own judgment for that of the Auditor.”

-snip-

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/missouri-abortion-ballot-measure-b3275e82ae6ea06336795902a7c19736

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri judge orders end to GOP officials' standoff over proposed abortion rights ballot measure (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2023 OP
Wow. ShazzieB Jun 2023 #1

ShazzieB

(18,756 posts)
1. Wow.
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 05:58 PM
Jun 2023
Bailey had refused to approve the price estimate, arguing that if the proposal were to succeed, it could cost the state as much as a million times more than that figure because of lost Medicaid funding or lost revenue that wouldn’t be collected from people who otherwise would be born.


I am gobsmacked! This has to be one of the lamest excuses ever for someone not doing their job.

On top of everything else, this dude is conveniently ignoring the costs to the government of forcing women to have babies they can't afford, many of whom will need public assistance to feed, clothe, and access health care for those children. But that's the Republican way: Always ignore any inconvenient facts that don't support your predetermined position.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Pro-Choice»Missouri judge orders end...