World History
Related: About this forumScientists have likely found Charlemagne's skeleton
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/02/05/newser-scientists-charlemagne-skeleton/5223971/
The German researchers say the 94 bones and bone fragments are from a tall, thin, older man, and their dimensions match descriptions of Charlemagne, who was unusually tall for the period at 6 feet, but also thin. (PhysOrg notes another oddity: His father, Pepin the Short, measured only about five feet.) The researchers also found evidence of injury to the kneecap and heel bones, which is consistent with claims that Charlemagne walked with a limp in his later years.
Researchers first secretly opened what was said to be the emperor's sarcophagus in 1988; he died in 814.
Most of the bones were found in his tomb, with some found in a bust depicting him and one found in a ceremonial container used to hold remains. As for the rest of his bones, they were likely given away as relics.
"Thanks to the results from 1988 up until today, we can say with great likelihood that we are dealing with the skeleton of Charlemagne," says one of the scientists. What they didn't determine: any new details about his health or cause of death.
USA NOW
BootinUp
(49,169 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(152,299 posts)Thank you for bringing it to us.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)I think about half the human race is directly descended from Charlemagne.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Can't wait to give him a hard time about it...
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)My 39th Great Grandfather.
unc70
(6,329 posts)Most everyone I know has him in their line. I've got him multiple ways!
BTE My brother looks a lot like all the pictures of Charlemagne.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)GeoWilliam750
(2,540 posts)Then again, on average, at 1,200 years in the past, the average individual living today is likely to have had on the order of a trillion ancestors (can make an argument for somewhat more). There may be a few duplicates amongst those trillion.
We are all far more closely related than one might imagine.
Then again, as the saying goes, you can choose your friends.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)What is/was the story of why there was doubt?
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Frank Ruhli, Head of the Center for Evolutionary Medicine at the University of Zurich in Switzerland, said that it might appear as an obvious conclusion but it isn't, as Charlemagne was exhumed and reburied many times with parts of his body given away as relics, so identifying his skeleton is not an easy task, Discovery News reported.
Ruhli, who announced the results of the study last week, 1,200 years after Charlemagne's death, said the bones appear to belong to a single individual, an old and rather tall man. This matches contemporary descriptions of Charlemagne.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)tclambert
(11,143 posts)As opposed to, say, the magician at the Renaissance Fair who goes by Zoltan the Adequate (Latin: Zoltanus Adaequatus).
AnneD
(15,774 posts)to Monty Python's Life of Brian. All the Roman soldiers that slept with women in Jerusalem told the women their names were Naughtius Maximus or Biggus Dickus.
tclambert
(11,143 posts)And Michael Palin (Pilate) insisted he had a friend in Rome whose name really was Biggus Dickus. And he had a wife, Incontinentia Buttocks.
thucythucy
(8,742 posts)about Vikings where one of the main characters is Thorkell the Misaligned.
Always loved that.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)There is some disagreement as to the meaning of Ivar's epithet "the Boneless" (inn Beinlausi) in the sagas. Some have suggested it was a euphemism for impotence or even a snake metaphor (he had a brother named Snake-in-the-Eye). It may have referred to an incredible physical flexibility; Ivar was a renowned warrior, and perhaps this limberness gave rise to the popular notion that he was "boneless". The poem "Háttalykill inn forni" describes Ivar as being "without any bones at all".
Alternatively, the English word "bone" is cognate with the German word "Bein", meaning "leg". Scandinavian sources mention Ivar the Boneless as being borne on a shield by his warriors. Some have speculated that this was because he could not walk and perhaps his epithet simply meant "legless"perhaps literally or perhaps simply because he was lame. Other sources from this period, however, mention chieftains being carried on the shields of enemies after victory, not because of any infirmity.
Of historical personages the author knows of only one of whom we have a vague suspicion that he suffered from osteogenesis imperfecta, namely Ivar Benløs, eldest son of the Danish legendary king Regnar Lodbrog. He is reported to have had legs as soft as cartilage ('he lacked bones'), so that he was unable to walk and had to be carried about on a shield.[9]
There are less extreme forms of this disease where the person affected can lack use of their legs but otherwise be unaffected, as may have been the case for Ivar the Boneless. In 2003 Nabil Shaban, a disability rights advocate with osteogenesis imperfecta, made the documentary The Strangest Viking for Channel 4's Secret History, in which he explored the possibility that Ivar the Boneless may have had the same condition as himself. It also demonstrated that someone with the condition was quite capable of using a longbow, such that Ivar could have taken part in battle, as Viking society would have expected a leader to do.
thucythucy
(8,742 posts)Thanks for the info!
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Reply #15)
Sweeney This message was self-deleted by its author.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)thucythucy
(8,742 posts)He has a short story called "We Are Norsemen" and one of the main characters is "Thorkell the Misaligned."
packman
(16,296 posts)A warrior/scholar who loved learning (even thou he reportedly couldn't write) and brought about a mini-renaissance in France and Germany. Head of the Holy Roman Empire, which my teachers liked to point out wasn't really an empire, nor Roman, and certainly not Holy.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)First non-white Muslims then
he launched a bloody war of extermination against the Saxon and other pagan German tribes under his control.
So after killing thousands of pagans, Charlemagne did manage to create a virtually uniform Christian kingdom
Head of the Holy Roman Empire by death and destruction
If you can't convert them kill them ? no not my kind of king but each to his own
packman
(16,296 posts)dynamics with 21st Century morality - a morality that was shaped by that death and destruction. Hard to believe any-ANY- early Middle Age person, especially a leader of a country would be anything but aggressive to the point of our perceived brutality in establishing order and their idea of civilization. Our judgment of death and destruction - their clear conscience of order and civilization. An argument for the times.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Sitting on a throne with an orb and scepter with a big bejeweled gold crown and wearing a fine fur robe.
Response to packman (Reply #9)
Sweeney This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lawlbringer
(550 posts)Response to Lawlbringer (Reply #14)
Sweeney This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Rowdyboy (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed