Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,470 posts)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 01:39 AM Feb 2012

Oakland man guilty of murder - no body of victim

An Oakland man was convicted Tuesday of second-degree murder for killing his ex-girlfriend in 2004 even though her body hasn't been found.

It is a case with similarities to that of Hans Reiser, who led police to his wife's body after he was convicted of murdering her in 2008.

Eric Mora, 55, showed no emotion when the verdict was read in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland. He faces 15 years to life in prison when he is sentenced May 25 by Judge Vern Nakahara for killing Cynthia Alonzo.

(...)

Alonzo was 48 when she failed to show up at a Thanksgiving dinner with her family in San Francisco in 2004. Her blood was found in his home on the 6200 block of Brookside Avenue in the Oakland hills, authorities said. Mora also had a deep cut to his hand, prosecutors said.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/02/28/BASS1NDFOK.DTL

Was the standard for conviction flimsy, given that investigators never found Alonzo's body for further evidence beyond the bloodstains and the suspect's hand wound?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oakland man guilty of murder - no body of victim (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2012 OP
Circumstantial evidence is often used. MrSlayer Feb 2012 #1
+1000 fe6252fes Jun 2012 #6
I'd have to have a heck of a lot more to convict Live and Learn Feb 2012 #2
What happened to habeas corpus? Viva_Daddy Mar 2012 #3
Innocent until proven . . . xrayvision2005 May 2012 #4
+1 padem196645 Jun 2012 #5
Easy answer Spryguy Aug 2012 #7
He's got one of the worst cases of vitiligo since Michael Jackson jberryhill Sep 2012 #8
I retract... Spryguy Oct 2012 #10
"Was the standard for conviction flimsy?" jberryhill Sep 2012 #9
Probably, it should be near impossible to get a conviction in such a situation TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #11

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
2. I'd have to have a heck of a lot more to convict
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 04:13 AM
Feb 2012

Hoping they did have it but if they did that was a pitiful news story.

xrayvision2005

(31 posts)
4. Innocent until proven . . .
Tue May 29, 2012, 04:10 PM
May 2012

Guilty by default is more apt to be the determining factor with many convictions. Whatever the media decides dictates the outcome. Evidence? Sensibility? Rationale? Inconsequential.

I was the victim of a crime and tried as the perpetrator. The greater the shock value, the more dollars stream into every pocket imaginable. That's certainly nothing new but it sure does hit home at a different level when you are the one who has been falsely accused. ANYONE reading could be the next detainee. Stay safe.

 

Spryguy

(120 posts)
7. Easy answer
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 07:56 PM
Aug 2012

I'm guessing the only evidence they had is that he was a black man. Typical rascist pig jurors/police.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. "Was the standard for conviction flimsy?"
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:15 AM
Sep 2012

I'm willing to bet that the trial consisted of more evidence than the two sentences in that flimsy article.

 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
11. Probably, it should be near impossible to get a conviction in such a situation
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 07:28 PM
Jan 2013

I'm not much on circumstantial evidence though.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Oakland man guilty of mur...