Drug Policy
Related: About this forumHuffPo: White House Takes Huge Step Forward In Fight Over Marijuana Research
Disagree that this is a "huge" step, but it is a baby step in the right direction. One stop on the local 'express' of mandated research approval stops...
De-scheduling (even Re-scheduling) would be *huge*. But here is the policy announcement - we take what we can get!
{snip}
Currently, marijuana research that is not funded by the government must go through a Public Health Service review -- a process established in 1999 by the federal government after a 1998 Institute of Medicine report called for more scientific research into the medical value of marijuana.
It's a process that no other substance classified by the government as Schedule I is subject to and one that researchers and lawmakers alike have criticized.
More (with links): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/22/public-health-service-review_n_7635760.html
pscot
(21,037 posts)is non existent. What there is is entirely customer based; reviews by people describing their own experience. It's a hell of a way to practice medicine.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,327 posts)pain relief, or pain tolerance. I get what you are saying, but PhARMA conducts research the same way on their compounds - reporting results as relayed by study participants.
pscot
(21,037 posts)many different strains until I find the right one? That seems harsh, but I guess I'll just have to soldier gamely on.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,327 posts)Some will work for your pain, others won't, but will cause ulcers and/or liver damage. Move from OTC to prescriptions and you have a whole host of other side effects on top of potential addiction issues.
The worst you can expect from cannabis is a horrendous case of the munchies, a night of couch plant, or an unexpected/unplanned nap.