Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
Fri May 17, 2019, 04:15 AM May 2019

Defense firm's 'excess profits' land in Congress's crosshairs

https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2019/05/15/defense-firms-excess-profits-land-in-congresss-crosshairs/

Defense firm’s ‘excess profits’ land in Congress’s crosshairs

By: Joe Gould ?  1 day ago

WASHINGTON ― Call it the gold-plated clutch disk.

The Pentagon paid contractor TransDigm $1,443 for a for a three-inch ring called a “non-vehicular clutch disk” which is used in the C-135 transport aircraft, though it cost the company just $32 to produce, giving it 4,436 percent in excess profit, according to a House Oversight and Government Reform memo released Wednesday.

The committee set to probe what it called TransDigm’s “extreme profit margins" at a hearing Wednesday, echoing a famous Pentagon crackdown in 1984 on “gold-plated” weapons and other items that are built to much higher standards than common sense would dictate. Lawmakers are expected to use the hearing to explore the potential need for greater transparency and stronger regulations on defense industry profits.

Rep. Ro Khanna, a member of the Oversight and Reform, Budget and Armed Services committees, had requested an internal probe of TransDigm and is leading Wednesday’s hearing. The witnesses are due to include Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Department of Defense Kevin Fahey, TransDigm executives Nicholas Howley and Kevin Stein, as well as the Defense Department’s Acting Inspector General Glenn Fine.
(snip)

TransDigm is a public corporation that manufactures parts for military aircraft, including the AH-64 Apache, C-17 Globemaster III, the F-16 Fighting Falcon, and the CH-47 Chinook—each of which is used in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the House Oversight and Government Reform is accusing it of gouging the government as its business model.

Under awards by the Defense Logistics Agency and the Army, the DODIG found in February that TransDigm earned “excess profit” for 112 of 113 contracts it reviewed. The IG’s office considers profit percentages of 15 percent or below to be “reasonable,” but TransDigm had profit margins ranging from 17 to a whopping 4,451 percent.

The Pentagon issued a total of 4,942 contracts to TransDigm valued at $471 million from April 2012 through January 2017. The department has has asked that the company repay $16.1 million in excess profits identified by the inspector.

The clutch disk wasn’t all. A 3 1/2-inch quick disconnect coupling half, used in the Freedom Fighter F-5 and the T-38 Talon aircraft, cost TransDigm only $173 to produce, but the company charged the Pentagon $6,986, resulting in 3,930 percent excess profit for TransDigm, according to the panel’s memo.

An $799 actuator cover assembly cost the Pentagon $11,988, earning TransDigm 1,385 percent excess profit. A $557 hydraulic valve cost the Pentagon $10,000, earning TransDigm 1,680 percent excess profit. A $39 motor brake ring cost the Pentagon $5,317 for an excess profit of 1,923 percent.

This was by design, according to the congressional memo, which cited whistleblower statements and internal documents.
(snip)
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Defense firm's 'excess profits' land in Congress's crosshairs (Original Post) nitpicker May 2019 OP
From the House Oversight and Government Reform website nitpicker May 2019 #1
good job Ro. maybe bit by bit they can expose this corruption Kurt V. May 2019 #2

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
1. From the House Oversight and Government Reform website
Fri May 17, 2019, 04:20 AM
May 2019
https://oversight.house.gov/legislation/hearings/dod-inspector-general-report-on-excess-profits-by-transdigm-group-inc

link to
https://oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/committee-held-hearing-on-defense-contractor-s-excess-profits

May 15, 2019
| Press Release

Washington, D.C. (May 15, 2019)—On Wednesday, the Committee on Oversight and Reform held a hearing on “DOD Inspector General Report on Excess Profits by TransDigm Group, Inc.”

TAKEAWAYS

•The memo prepared by Committee staff released during today’s hearing summarizes new documents obtained by the Committee regarding TransDigm’s extreme profit margins, as well as information from whistleblowers and former company officials about efforts to conceal data about the company’s costs for manufacturing these parts.

•TransDigm refused to commit to paying the Department of Defense (DOD) a refund of the $16.1 million in excess profits it received through its price gouging. Democratic and Republican members of the Committee urged TransDigm to immediately reimburse the DOD and end its unethical business practices.

•TransDigm’s Chief Executive Officer Kevin Stein admitted that the company’s employees withheld cost data from contracting officers for 15 parts manufactured by the company despite requests from contracting officers. Stein claimed that TransDigm can legally withhold cost data for commercial items, but none of the 15 parts had been deemed commercial items, according to testimony from the DOD.

•Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Kevin Fahey testified, “we look forward to working with Congress to find ways to prevent companies like TransDigm from gouging the taxpayers with their sickening business practices.”

•As a result of TransDigm’s price gouging, Mr. Fahey explained that the DOD overpaid for mission-critical parts, diverting resources that could have been used for additional military needs. Mr. Fahey testified, “Every time you’re paying a cost that is outrageous, you could be spending that money somewhere else. For example, if we got our $16 million back, we could be buying other spare parts to increase readiness.”
(snip)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Defense firm's 'excess pr...