Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Veterans
Related: About this forumObama Backs Unproven Missile Defense for Uncertain Threat
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-19/obama-backs-unproven-missile-defense-for-uncertain-threat.htmlU.S. soldiers work on a Patriot missile system at a Turkish military base in Gaziantep on February 5, 2013.
Obama Backs Unproven Missile Defense for Uncertain Threat
By Gopal Ratnam & Tony Capaccio - 2013-03-19T18:25:42Z
The Obama administrations decision to shift $1 billion to a missile-defense system in the U.S. is raising questions about the still-unproven missile shields effectiveness and the threats posed by North Korea and Iran.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said March 15 that the Pentagon would add 14 land-based interceptors in Alaska in response to threats from North Korea. To pay for that move and develop an advanced warhead, about $1 billion would be shifted from efforts to develop a missile shield in Poland and Romania.
The money would go toward expanding the current arsenal of 30 interceptors the Pentagon has fielded as part of its Ground- Based Midcourse Defense system, which is designed to shoot down long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles. The systems poor test record and history of technical malfunctions have clouded whether it can reliably stop long-range missiles such as the ones that North Korea and Iran are suspected of developing.
At best, the announcement may be a symbolic one to reassure U.S. allies South Korea and Japan that President Barack Obama takes saber-rattling by North Korea seriously, as well as to win some Republican support at home, said Joseph Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, a San Francisco-based security research policy group.
unhappycamper comment: That one billion dollars is for fourteen, count 'em, 14 Standard missiles. Too bad about your 'entitlements'.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1910 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Backs Unproven Missile Defense for Uncertain Threat (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Mar 2013
OP
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)1. I had no idea either one is suicidal enough or that either one of them have long range missiles
capable of reaching US.
Funny though how they ALWAYS find money for stupid military projects.
Purplehazed
(179 posts)2. A new cold war...
might just kick the economy into high gear.....
It's a proud day to know that being furloughed might just contribute to political posturing.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)3. I think you hit the nail on the head. Iraq is the new USSR, and NK is the new Cuba, I guess.
BTW, am very sorry about cuts to veterans benefits that republicans managed to get through. Very sorry.