Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 06:57 AM Mar 2013

Obama Backs Unproven Missile Defense for Uncertain Threat

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-19/obama-backs-unproven-missile-defense-for-uncertain-threat.html



U.S. soldiers work on a Patriot missile system at a Turkish military base in Gaziantep on February 5, 2013.

Obama Backs Unproven Missile Defense for Uncertain Threat
By Gopal Ratnam & Tony Capaccio - 2013-03-19T18:25:42Z

The Obama administration’s decision to shift $1 billion to a missile-defense system in the U.S. is raising questions about the still-unproven missile shield’s effectiveness and the threats posed by North Korea and Iran.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said March 15 that the Pentagon would add 14 land-based interceptors in Alaska in response to threats from North Korea. To pay for that move and develop an advanced warhead, about $1 billion would be shifted from efforts to develop a missile shield in Poland and Romania.

The money would go toward expanding the current arsenal of 30 interceptors the Pentagon has fielded as part of its Ground- Based Midcourse Defense system, which is designed to shoot down long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles. The system’s poor test record and history of technical malfunctions have clouded whether it can reliably stop long-range missiles such as the ones that North Korea and Iran are suspected of developing.

At best, the announcement may be a symbolic one to reassure U.S. allies South Korea and Japan that President Barack Obama takes saber-rattling by North Korea seriously, as well as to win some Republican support at home, said Joseph Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, a San Francisco-based security research policy group.



unhappycamper comment: That one billion dollars is for fourteen, count 'em, 14 Standard missiles. Too bad about your 'entitlements'.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Backs Unproven Missile Defense for Uncertain Threat (Original Post) unhappycamper Mar 2013 OP
I had no idea either one is suicidal enough or that either one of them have long range missiles idwiyo Mar 2013 #1
A new cold war... Purplehazed Mar 2013 #2
I think you hit the nail on the head. Iraq is the new USSR, and NK is the new Cuba, I guess. idwiyo Mar 2013 #3

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
1. I had no idea either one is suicidal enough or that either one of them have long range missiles
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 07:31 AM
Mar 2013

capable of reaching US.

Funny though how they ALWAYS find money for stupid military projects.

Purplehazed

(179 posts)
2. A new cold war...
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 07:43 AM
Mar 2013

might just kick the economy into high gear.....

It's a proud day to know that being furloughed might just contribute to political posturing.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
3. I think you hit the nail on the head. Iraq is the new USSR, and NK is the new Cuba, I guess.
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 09:14 AM
Mar 2013

BTW, am very sorry about cuts to veterans benefits that republicans managed to get through. Very sorry.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Obama Backs Unproven Miss...