Two Obamas, Two Classes of Children (**graphic pic**)

[unhappycamper]

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/04/11-10



The lifeless bodies of Afghan children lay on the ground before their funeral ceremony, after an airstrike on their extended family household by order of President Barack Obama killed several Afghan adults and at least ten children in Shultan, Shigal district, Kunar, eastern Afghanistan, Sunday, April 7, 2013.

Two Obamas, Two Classes of Children
by Ralph Nader
Published on Thursday, April 11, 2013 by Common Dreams

An Associated Press photograph brought the horror of little children lying dead outside of their home to an American Audience. At least 10 Afghan children and some of their mothers were struck down by an airstrike on their extended family household by order of President Barack Obama. He probably decided on what his aides describe as the routine weekly “Terror Tuesday” at the White House. On that day, Mr. Obama typically receives the advice about which “militants” should live or die thousands of miles away from drones or aircraft. Even if households far from war zones are often destroyed in clear violation of the laws of war, the president is not deterred.

These Obama airstrikes are launched knowing that very often there is “collateral damage,” that is a form of “so sorry terrorism.” How can the president explain the vaporization of a dozen pre-teen Afghan boys collecting firewood for their families on a hillside? The local spotter-informants must have been disoriented by all those $100 bills in rewards. Imagine a direct strike killing and injuring scores of people in a funeral procession following a previous fatal strike that was the occasion of this processional mourning. Remember the December 2009 Obama strike on an alleged al-Qaida training camp in Yemen, using tomahawk missiles and – get this – cluster bombs, that killed 14 women and 21 children. Again and again “so sorry terrorism” ravages family households far from the battlefields.

If this is a war, why hasn’t Congress declared war under Article 1, Sec. 8 of the U.S. Constitution? The 2001 Congressional Authorization to Use Military Force is not an open-ended authorization for the president. It was restricted to targeting only nations, organizations or persons that are determined to have been implicated in the 9/11 massacres, or harbored complicit organizations or persons.

~snip~

Unless the American people come to realize that a president must be subject to the rule of law and our Constitution, our statutes and treaties, every succeeding president will push the deficit-financed lawlessness further until the inevitable blowback day of reckoning. That is the fate of all empires.

[Victor_c3]

1. Shitty picture, but it needs to be seen by the American public

Our government and elected officials need to be held accountable for their actions.

[Newest Reality]

2. Those children

never declared themselves our enemy. They were just as precious and important as any child here.

That's the double-standard we have. It's no okay here, but there ... well, war, (occupation) and all that.

So, it is murder of innocents, plain and simple. Yet, we will sweep that under the carpet or put that in the family closet with Uncle Sam who has been bat-shit crazy for a long time. Shhh. Nobody is supposed to know about his jackal deals and serial killing sprees!

Well, we have another double-standard economically here, what with the large and growing numbers of our children in abject poverty which can be dangerous for many reasons.