Veterans
Related: About this forumWTF??? Pentagon: Who We're At War With Is Classified
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/26/pentagon-war-classified_n_3659353.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopularPentagon: Who We're At War With Is Classified
ProPublica | By Cora Currier Posted: 07/26/2013 12:35 pm EDT | Updated: 07/26/2013 10:09 pm EDT
In a major national security speech this spring, President Obama said again and again that the U.S. is at war with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and their associated forces.
~snip~
At a hearing in May, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., asked the Defense Department to provide him with a current list of Al Qaeda affiliates.
The Pentagon responded but Levins office told ProPublica they arent allowed to share it. Kathleen Long, a spokeswoman for Levin, would say only that the departments answer included the information requested.
A Pentagon spokesman told ProPublica that revealing such a list could cause serious damage to national security.
unhappycamper comment: So we are in (another) secret war. Oh, goody.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Doncha know?
grilled onions
(1,957 posts)Where that is, is a matter of opinion, at the moment, among the war mongers. At times it appears to have similarity to a Chinese menu. One from country A but also a side war with B,C, and or D. They want to cover as much ground as possible to those troublesome peace people back home, to try and convince them that war is needed,wanted, a good deal.
Scan the news any given week and you will see them dropping names off their forked tongues about which country is next or should be included.
The only things they don't talk about is who is going to finance the next rodeo and they can't explain why there isn't any money to fix that crumbling bridge, allow seniors to eat AND pay their bills or allow everyone who gets sick to be able to see a doctor, but they can always cough up the bucks for war.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)With a secret war all the money is secret as well.
You also have none of that pesky oversight throughout the process.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)like Cambodia.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)We didn't want the Cambodians to find out that we were bombing them.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Solly Mack
(92,623 posts)Just shut up and wave the flag!
Orrex
(64,076 posts)Heck, you might be aiding them right now. How would you know?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)could cause serious damage to national security ? How?
That makes no sense at all.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)We are not to know that our own government is at war with us. And if we suspect and object, that is proof that we are the enemy.
National security is at stake here.
It makes perfect sense if one is a paranoid power monger whose pay check depends on anyone "not us" automatically being the enemy. "Not us", being anyone not rich enough to profit from their wars.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)pasto76
(1,589 posts)those 'affiliates' have always been classified.
this is a real reach, and the attempt at the hyped up drama is unbecoming.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)and the reasons for that classification are still unrevealed.
westerebus
(2,977 posts)ACLU
OWS
SLPC
Doctors w/o Borders
Earth First
You can add as many as you think.
Unless thinking has become a crime.
But, we wouldn't know that as that too is classified.
At least I think so..
Cuba
Syria
World Wild Life Fund
Union of Concerned Scientists
Civilization2
(649 posts)Rather sadly, there are some on this very site that STILL believe the hype!
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)Response to unhappycamper (Original post)
mother earth This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ford_Prefect
(8,198 posts)ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)do you hate the troops?
valerief
(53,235 posts)Lugal Zaggesi
(366 posts)The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war. Congress has declared war on 11 occasions, including its first declaration of war with Great Britain in 1812. Congress approved its last formal declaration of war during World War II:
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/h_multi_sections_and_teasers/WarDeclarationsbyCongress.htm
There are few things more dangerous in a democracy than allowing a President to wage secret wars without the knowledge of the country. Ill permit Abraham Lincoln not exactly a pacifistic worshipper of legalisms and restraints on Executive power to explain why this is so, in an 1848 letter to a proponent of unrestrained presidential warmaking powers:
Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so, whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose and you allow him to make war at pleasure. Study to see if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect, after you have given him so much as you propose.
If, to-day, he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada, to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him? You may say to him, I see no probability of the British invading us but he will say to you be silent; I see it, if you dont.
The provision of the Constitution giving the war-making power to Congress, was dictated, as I understand it, by the following reasons. Kings had always been involving and impoverishing their people in wars, pretending generally, if not always, that the good of the people was the object. This, our Convention understood to be the most oppressive of all Kingly oppressions; and they resolved to so frame the Constitution that no one man should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us. But your view destroys the whole matter, and places our President where kings have always stood.
http://dangerousintersection.org/2012/07/13/abe-lincolns-warning-about-allowing-a-president-alone-to-declare-war/
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Besides that bit of information, ProPublica has published information that was given to them before that was not supposed to be made public.
In December 2012 and January 2013, ProPublica published and reported on confidential pending applications for groups requesting tax-exempt status. After it became known that the Cincinnati office of the IRS had inappropriately targeted conservative groups, in May 2013 ProPublica clarified that it obtained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act request, writing, "In response to a request for the applications for 67 different nonprofits last November, the Cincinnati office of the IRS sent ProPublica applications or documentation for 31 groups. Nine of those applications had not yet been approvedmeaning they were not supposed to be made public." ProPublica reported on six of them, after deeming information within those applications to be newsworthy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProPublica#Notable_reporting