Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Veterans
Related: About this forumCongress Must Scrap Generous DoD Benefits For Future Forces: Rep. Hunter
http://breakingdefense.com/2013/11/congress-must-scrap-generous-dod-benefits-for-future-forces-rep-hunter/Congress Must Scrap Generous DoD Benefits For Future Forces: Rep. Hunter
By Colin Clark and Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
on November 14, 2013 at 1:25 PM
WASHINGTON: Career soldiers can retire at 42, get a great deal on Tricare health insurance, take home a pension, and get paid a good private-sector salary on top of that. That cant continue to be the norm for the military and Congress must create a two-tier pay system, says Rep. Duncan Hunter, Marine Corps reservist and member of the House Armed Services Committee.
Its time for Congress to look at this, Hunter said at the inaugural Defense One conference. The message must be sent that, If you join tomorrow things are going to be different.
Hunter was careful to argue that those currently in the military should still get the benefits promised them, but the next group must receive reduced benefits, because growing compensation costs will eat up a majority of the defense budget should they go unchecked. If a servicemember retires and gets a good private sector job say as a defense contractor then they dont need Tricare, Hunter said: You should have to buy into [private] healthcare and stop being subsidized by the American taxpayer.
Congress, however, has been a big part of the problem, repeatedly increasing benefits over whats proposed in the Presidents budget and rejecting even modest increases in, for example, Tricare fees. When a recommendation comes from the Department of Defense and then what comes back is a number higher than what was proposed, of course we have to pay that, said Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Snow, the Armys outspoken director of strategy, plans, and policy, at the conference this morning. This is a challenge because the Congress has opted obviously in some cases to pay even more than we asked.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1891 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress Must Scrap Generous DoD Benefits For Future Forces: Rep. Hunter (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Nov 2013
OP
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)1. Only after we scrap generous benefits for
congress. Their pensions alone cost us dearly every year.
exboyfil
(17,987 posts)2. Unless they plan to draft
Good luck with the recruiting. All employment is a contract. You change the compensation you will get a shallower talent pool.