'I've never seen these positions politicized': White House rejection of veterans judges raises conce

[douglas9]

The Board of Veterans’ Appeals has long filled a nonpartisan role in the federal government, run by dozens of judges charged with sorting through a thicket of regulations to determine whether an injured veteran is entitled to lifetime benefits.

But this summer, the White House rejected half of the candidates selected by the board chairwoman to serve as administrative judges, who make rulings on the disability claims. The rejections came after the White House required them to disclose their party affiliation and other details of their political leanings, according to documents viewed by The Washington Post.

Such questions had not been asked of judge candidates in the past, according to former judges and board staff.

As part of the process, the candidates were asked to provide links to their social media profiles and disclose whether they had ever given a speech to Congress, spoken at a political convention, appeared on talk radio, or published an opinion piece in a conservative forum such as Breitbart News or a liberal one such as Mother Jones, according to one candidate, who requested anonymity because the person is not authorized to speak to the media.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ive-never-seen-these-positions-politicized-white-house-rejection-of-veterans-judges-raises-concerns-of-partisanship/2018/10/23/f488046a-ce51-11e8-920f-dd52e1ae4570_story.html?utm_term=.9aaa731163b0

[magicarpet]

1. Oh, you are not a Fascist,.. take a hike then,.. we don't like you or need you.

[HDSam]

2. If true...

it’s a really bad idea by the administration if for no other reason that Veterans who have their appeals denied will now be able to blame that denial on a party.

As a disabled Veteran that works closely with other disabled Veterans, I know the claims and appeals process is a constant source of criticism and this will add to the existing distrust of the system.