African American
Related: About this forumWhy do both people love conspiracies, while denying oppression that is in plain sight?
it is funny how people love hidden conspiracies so much more than they love oppression that is in plain sight. There was no voter fraud or election fraud this cycle, but there was massive voter suppression of the black vote.
This was the first election post the striking down of the voting rights act.
We need contribute to real issues and spend our time fixing real things. Giving Jill Stein money is not helpful and further bolsters GOP talking points that there is election/voter fraud.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)In places like Wayne County
but you could not be more right about combatting voter suppression (in fact, one of the major forms of voter suppression . . . sticking urban neighborhoods with an inadequate number of polling places and poll workers and with the most worn out machines . . . is a big factor in what happened in Wayne County).
It's everywhere Republicans are in control and it's probably going to get much worse.
We need money, but, whenever possible, people on the ground because the fact is that black people are going to have every "t" crossed and every "i" dotted come time for the next election.
Big rec!
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)How does "giving Jill Stein money" not show that there is voter suppression? I would posit that the recount can help by pointing to the systematic suppression of AA voters via inadequate infrastructure around the voting process. That's not to say they have other ways of suppressing AA votes of which striking down the voting rights act, voter ID, felon laws etc. are major factors. But there is also throwing out ballots, inadequate machines and ballot tampering. I think there are lots of ways to skin the cat...
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)and more and more people become OK with voter ID etc.
here is a great root article about it http://www.theroot.com/articles/politics/2016/11/4-ways-the-jill-stein-recount-screws-black-voters/
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)there is voter suppression and that is #1, we need to focus on the mid-terms and get people to start paying a whole lot more attention to local elections from dog catcher to , judges to state senator, sec of state etc. not sure how the recount distracts from that...it will be over in a week or two. How does the recount have any impact on whether or not people are focused on other things, we can walk and chew gum at the same time. I think there is a good possibility it will show how rotten and systemic our election infrastructure is vs. voter fraud. It is highly unlikely that any voter fraud would be uncovered, but it could give us more ammunition to point to the f'd up system we have by calling into question the legitimacy of the outcome in say, Michigan. Finally, Jill Stein is not going to use that money to buy a summer home, no one is "giving her money", it's mostly been spent already, it's not hers to keep.
progressoid
(50,747 posts)It's possible to fight this on multiple fronts.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/27/green-party-voter-id-tennessee_n_3822968.html
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Then yes, if not, no
think
(11,641 posts)the number of polling places needs to be increased in communities where it has become common place to wait hours in line, and early voting needs to be expanded not curtailed.
And restore the Voting Rights Act.
This should be a major focus for Democrats. Voter suppression is a multi pronged approach by the GOP that needs to be addressed on all of those levels to truly get voting rights reformed.
For what it's worth Jill Stein is condemning the use of the Interstate Cross Check system and other voter suppression tactics:
http://www.jill2016.com/interstate_crosscheck
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)Seems like a no brainer to me. I understand the tactical reasons not to go there but not the logic of the OP.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Land Shark
(6,346 posts)Consider that incentive, plus the radical lack of transparency involved with software amd the denial of all forensic requests when weighing insider fraud (which can deliver the desired results) vs voter fraud (never delivers results) and voter suppression (needs to be huge and visible, may or may not deliver the results desired)
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Land Shark
(6,346 posts)The demands for proof in order to proceed with discovery of facts is one of the most bizarre things I've come across in the twenty one years since I started law school.