Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,845 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2017, 06:54 PM Feb 2017

Texan whose jury was told blacks more likely to be dangerous can appeal, Supreme Court rules

WASHINGTON — Twenty years after a psychologist testified that convicted murderer Duane Buck was a risk for “future dangerousness” because he was black, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Buck will be allowed to continue an appeal of his death row sentence.

In a 6-2 decision issued Wednesday, the court ruled that Buck was sent to death row in part because of racially biased testimony and should be allowed to seek a new sentencing trial. The testimony in question was provided by a psychologist, Walter Quijano, who had a long history of asserting that black and Hispanic men were more likely to be dangerous in the future than their white counterparts.

“Dr. Quijano’s testimony appealed to a powerful racial stereotype — that of black men as ‘violence prone,’ ” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.

In Texas, jurors must unanimously agree that a person poses a risk of “future dangerousness” in order to sentence him or her to death.

Read more: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2017/02/22/texan-whose-jury-told-blacks-likely-dangerous-can-appeal-supreme-court-rules

Cross-posted in the Texas Group.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»Texan whose jury was told...