Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

African American

brush

(57,488 posts) Tue Dec 24, 2019, 07:26 PM Dec 2019

Coomplaints from some white historians about the NYT's "1619 Project".

Perhaps written too much from a black perspective?

https://www.theroot.com/notallhistorians-some-white-people-are-upset-that-the-1840616511?utm_source=theroot_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-12-24

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Coomplaints from some white historians about the NYT's "1619 Project". (Original Post) brush Dec 2019 OP

!!!! BlueMTexpat Dec 2019 #1

. Susan Calvin Dec 2019 #2

Yes, one is not supposed to contest prevailing wisdom. brush Dec 2019 #3

Thanks. Susan Calvin Dec 2019 #4

BlueMTexpat

(15,496 posts)

1. !!!!

Reply to brush (Original post)

Wed Dec 25, 2019, 10:01 AM

Dec 2019

Wow! Just wow!

Susan Calvin

(2,097 posts)

2. .

Reply to brush (Original post)

Wed Dec 25, 2019, 10:37 AM

Dec 2019

Their main quibble with the 1619 Project is that it “intended to offer a new version of American history in which slavery and white supremacy become the dominant organizing themes,” which upsets the prevailing narrative.

Wasn't that the point?

brush

(57,488 posts)

3. Yes, one is not supposed to contest prevailing wisdom.

Reply to Susan Calvin (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 25, 2019, 10:49 AM

Dec 2019

I like your Smedley Butler screen icon.

Susan Calvin

(2,097 posts)

4. Thanks.

Reply to brush (Reply #3)

Wed Dec 25, 2019, 12:50 PM

Dec 2019

I can't even see it myself on this device.

Reply to this discussion