Baldwin-Buckley race debate still resonates 55 years on
It looks like there's a new book out about this debate! It looks like he unpacks some of the stuff that happened in the debate.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/baldwin-buckley-race-debate-still-resonates-55-years-on
From the transcript (at link):
Zachary Green:
On the evening of February 18, 1965, two cultural giantsJames Baldwin and William F. Buckley, Jr.squared off in-person for the first time. More than 50 years later, the debate still resonates. Political science professor Nicholas Buccola of Linfield College in Oregon was so taken with the skirmish that he wrote a book about it: "The Fire is Upon Us".
Nicholas Buccola:
It just seemed to me just such a dramatic moment andsuch an important one. So these two movements that did so much to define 20th centurypolitical historyto have these two figures clashingwas justjust irresistible.
Zachary Green:
Though Baldwin and Buckley were about the same age, their lives could not have begun more differently. Baldwin grew up in poverty in Harlem, and went from waiting tables in New York's Greenwich Village to become a literary critic and, eventually, a renowned novelist and essayist. Buckley, a scion of wealth, graduated from Yale and became an influential magazine editor and columnist. Both wrote extensively about race in 1950s and 60s Americathough from drastically different points of view. Buckley made his position clear in a 1957 national review piece called "why the south must prevail"in which he contended that white southerners were entitled toquote"take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally" over black citizens.
snip
Nicholas Buccola:
To be a patriot for Buckley meant standing up for the institutions and ideas that you take to becentral to the American political experiment, and he viewed his role throughout his life asas being somebody who would be a guardian of those ideals against ideas, andand institutions, and groups that he thought were threatening to those ideals. Baldwin says that patriotism requires a constant criticism, a constant reflection on the ways in which we're falling short of ourour ideals andand to love one's country means that we have to do that together. It's the foundation of morally how we shhow we ought to behave, how we ought to live together, and it's the foundation politically of what we need to do as a country to move closer to justice.