Science Fiction
Related: About this forum"Star Wars vs. Star Trek: An Objective Analysys"
http://www.cracked.com/article_19612_star-wars-vs-star-trek-objective-analysis.html
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)I'll show you a REAL insane internet argument!
Stand back now...
Don't want to be too close when this thing goes off...
Ahem...
"Defiant vs. White Star"
(Dives for cover)
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Am I missing something?
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)Pretty funny.
Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning is a 2005 motion picture produced by five friends in a two-room flat with a small budget and the support of a few hundred fans and dozens of acquaintances. Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning is the seventh production in the Star Wreck movie series, the first of professional quality and feature length. It is a dark science fiction comedy about domination of the world and the universe, and a parody of the Star Trek and Babylon 5 universes.
Fozzledick
(3,890 posts)Yeah, I'll buy that!
MilesColtrane
(18,678 posts)(The Heisenberg compensators started to fail, but Scotty completed the transport by diverting power to the energizing coils and boosting the annular confinement beam.)
-----> X100
Star Wars - Real scientific terms thrown in to the script to boost "sci-fi cred", but used laughingly incorrectly
(You've never heard of the Millennium Falcon?
It's the ship that made the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs.)
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Lord knows ST has its share of continuity problems, but I don't think they ever abused units like that.
"Asteroid incoming... time to impact: 20,000 miles."
FloridaJudy
(9,465 posts)Let me think about that. I'll get back to you in a few light years.
lazarus
(27,383 posts)instead of a straight point-to-point journey, the Kessel run is a smuggling trip that hits various ports and has to avoid Imperial forces. Doing it in the shortest distance possible would be an achievement, then.
HTH.
Twist twist twist! I hope your insurance has a nice chiropractic benefit.
lazarus
(27,383 posts)It's a fairly simple explanation. I have no idea if it's valid, as I'm not one who reads the expanded universe stuff to learn all the background info. I liked the first two films, had huge problems with the third, have more problems with the first two if I think about them as anything but fantasy ("only stormtroopers are this accurate", but they can't hit a thing when rebels are involved), and the prequels are simply abominations.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Same for Star Trek, although I used to. I own the first 50 of the Pocket Star Trek novels... still.
FloridaJudy
(9,465 posts)In Bujold's Vorkosigan universe, the distance between planets can be quite different, depending on which series of wormholes one uses to jump. It not only gets around the light speed limit, but explains why some planets that would be otherwise be too marginal to considered desirable for human habitation can be worth fighting over: their proximity to a wormhole makes them valuable as a transit point, rather as Greenland is for planes needing to refuel when taking a polar route.
Of course that's twisting physics - as well as logic - into a pretzel. I don't remember wormholes being mentioned in SW at all, and only touched on as a hazard in ST: "OMG! We're caught in a wormhole! Do something!"
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)FloridaJudy
(9,465 posts)[img][/img]
salvorhardin
(9,995 posts)They have machines that rip you apart atom for atom and reassemble you someplace else, they have robots with Pinocchio syndromes, they travel thousands of times the speed of light, their doctors can cure cancer and mend bones in seconds, their idea of a vacation is recreating 19th C. London -- all of it, and you can get anything you want to eat, instantly, simply by talking into a wall... So is it too hard to imagine self-cleaning carpets?
TheKentuckian
(26,260 posts)or competition. Other than having Star in their names and being set in parts in space there is little correlation.