Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

a kennedy

(32,073 posts) Tue Sep 5, 2023, 12:00 PM Sep 2023

Coco playing Ostapenko, who took out the #1 seed on Saturday.

Coco won the first set no problem, now in the 2nd set, she ‘s having a lot of trouble……. Come on Coco.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Coco playing Ostapenko, who took out the #1 seed on Saturday. (Original Post) a kennedy Sep 2023 OP

Coco's up a break. Nt spooky3 Sep 2023 #1

Opponent is WAY OFF today.......usually I'm scared of her. a kennedy Sep 2023 #2

And she wins! Nt spooky3 Sep 2023 #4

Crowd is going now for match point for Coco a kennedy Sep 2023 #3

AND SHE's IN THE SEMI FINALS. 👏🏻 👏🏻 👏🏻 a kennedy Sep 2023 #5

Another Penko flop after a big win. Raftergirl Sep 2023 #6

spooky3

(36,204 posts)

1. Coco's up a break. Nt

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Sep 5, 2023, 12:05 PM

Sep 2023

a kennedy

(32,073 posts)

2. Opponent is WAY OFF today.......usually I'm scared of her.

Reply to spooky3 (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 5, 2023, 12:21 PM

Sep 2023

Duce in 2nd set.

spooky3

(36,204 posts)

4. And she wins! Nt

Reply to a kennedy (Reply #2)

Tue Sep 5, 2023, 12:22 PM

Sep 2023

a kennedy

(32,073 posts)

3. Crowd is going now for match point for Coco

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Sep 5, 2023, 12:21 PM

Sep 2023

a kennedy

(32,073 posts)

5. AND SHE's IN THE SEMI FINALS. 👏🏻 👏🏻 👏🏻

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Sep 5, 2023, 12:22 PM

Sep 2023

Raftergirl

(1,367 posts)

6. Another Penko flop after a big win.

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Wed Sep 6, 2023, 09:18 AM

Sep 2023

Never change Aljona.

Reply to this discussion