Baseball
Related: About this forumBunting to beat the shift
On Sunday, Chance Sisco of the Baltimore Orioles dropped down a bunt to beat the shift vs. the Minnesota Twins with his team down seven runs in the bottom of the ninth, and the Twins were pretty darn angry about it, saying that the Orioles shouldn't have bunted in that situation. Anyone agree?
Personally, I think that the bunt was fine. You want to do anything you can to start a rally or keep your team in the game. If the Twins were claiming it is "disrespectful of the game", then why did they still even have the shift on?
Ohiya
(2,432 posts)In baseball the game is not over until it is over. Unlike games governed by a clock!
that MLB wants to address those never-ending extra inning games, too. Something about either shortening them to x number of innings and then if it's still tied, postponing them to be made up later .... or (this is really stupid if you ask me) starting the inning for each team with a man on second. I will try and find a link.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)The Polack MSgt
(13,425 posts)Up by 7 in the 9th?
I'd be pissed off if I was an Oriole.
Always bunt on the shift against the Twins from now on.
PAMod
(933 posts)If the game is close enough for the shift, it's close enough for the obvious foil to the shift.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)I would have all my hitters bunt against the shift until they don't shift.
JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)Anything you can do to defeat, or better yet make it look ridiculous, is fair game.
It's called "being hoist on your own petard" or, in modern language, "blown up by your own bomb."
kairos12
(13,248 posts)Shifting players around turning the SS into a short right fielder makes the infield look like a beer league softball game. I guess you could bunt all day along to beat it, but who is paying top dollar to see power hitters bunt all day long?