Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bleacher Creature

(11,436 posts)
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 01:02 PM Jan 2022

Column: If Barry Bonds isn't a Hall of Famer by the end of the day, it's a failure by the HOF



I agree with this 100%. Bonds was clearly a Hall of Famer before he was ever reported to take PEDs. There are also some incredibly odious people in the Hall of Fame who've done far worse. Bonds is easily one of the five best hitters who ever lived, and his exclusion is absolutely ridiculous.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Column: If Barry Bonds isn't a Hall of Famer by the end of the day, it's a failure by the HOF (Original Post) Bleacher Creature Jan 2022 OP
Yeah even though I'm from the Bay, I dunno that I'd go this far ... Hugh_Lebowski Jan 2022 #1
He certainly was Casady1 Jan 2022 #7
I think the consensus is that he first started taking PEDs in 1999. Bleacher Creature Jan 2022 #8
Fair enough, I guess what I'm questioning is whether the 'reported' use is really when it started Hugh_Lebowski Jan 2022 #9
But he didn't, and his eligibility should be judged on his *whole* career Fiendish Thingy Jan 2022 #13
Nope madville Jan 2022 #2
Amen! overleft Jan 2022 #3
What are your feelings Casady1 Jan 2022 #6
Be consistent madville Jan 2022 #11
do you know Casady1 Jan 2022 #12
I didn't mention them specifically, you tell me madville Jan 2022 #16
So you basically know nothing Casady1 Jan 2022 #19
Keep your blinders on if you wish madville Jan 2022 #20
I have been following baseball Casady1 Jan 2022 #21
I agree SCantiGOP Jan 2022 #15
No, no he doesn't. n/t ms liberty Jan 2022 #4
* unweird Jan 2022 #5
No fucking way. Bonds, Canseco and McGwire nearly destroyed the sport Fiendish Thingy Jan 2022 #10
How do you feel Casady1 Jan 2022 #14
That's what I don't get either. Bleacher Creature Jan 2022 #18
x1000! Capt. America Feb 2022 #22
Sometimes cheaters don't win. Xoan Jan 2022 #17
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
1. Yeah even though I'm from the Bay, I dunno that I'd go this far ...
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 01:11 PM
Jan 2022

I think it's debatable.

"Bonds was clearly a Hall of Famer before he was ever reported to take PED"

Again, not so sure about that.

But that's just me

I'm good with trusting the HoF to do (at least something approaching) the right thing.

Bleacher Creature

(11,436 posts)
8. I think the consensus is that he first started taking PEDs in 1999.
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 01:50 PM
Jan 2022

Here's a blurb from a Washington Post article looking at his stats before that time period.

If his career had ended in 1998, Bonds would be a .290 hitter with 411 home runs, 1,917 hits, 1,216 RBI, 1,357 walks (289 intentional) and a .966 OPS (164 OPS+). There are four other players eligible for the Hall of Fame with at least 400 home runs and 1,900 hits combined with a .290 career average and 160 career OPS+, all are enshrined in Cooperstown — Babe Ruth, Mickey Mantle, Jimmie Foxx and Ted Williams.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fancy-stats/wp/2017/01/17/if-barry-bonds-ended-his-career-before-steroid-use-hed-be-a-clear-hall-of-famer/
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
9. Fair enough, I guess what I'm questioning is whether the 'reported' use is really when it started
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 02:24 PM
Jan 2022

And I do think it's not unreasonable for there to be a penalty for having used them for years while still playing.

I'm fine with him getting in, but if the HoF decides not to, I'm not going to view it as a major travesty.

madville

(7,457 posts)
2. Nope
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 01:13 PM
Jan 2022

He ruined his own legacy with the steroid use and years of legal trouble caused by him trying to evade answering questions truthfully about it.

I his career and single season HR records should be removed from the books also. McGuire and Sosa should also have theirs stricken from the record books.

madville

(7,457 posts)
16. I didn't mention them specifically, you tell me
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 03:33 PM
Jan 2022

But no lol, just as most others I don’t have intimate detailed first hand knowledge of the hundreds of players that allegedly used steroids during that era. Some have admitted it openly, some blatantly lied about it under oath and in front of Congress, some still deny it to this day.

In the end, it’s up to the HOF voters to judge as far as getting in there, our opinions don’t matter.

 

Casady1

(2,133 posts)
19. So you basically know nothing
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 05:42 PM
Jan 2022

about baseball but you are passing your opinion on with no facts. Sounds kind of republican.

madville

(7,457 posts)
20. Keep your blinders on if you wish
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 05:55 PM
Jan 2022

Obviously some can do no wrong in your eyes and shouldn’t suffer any consequences, gee, what’s that sound like…….lol

 

Casady1

(2,133 posts)
21. I have been following baseball
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 07:31 PM
Jan 2022

Since 1959 and my dad took me to Ebbets field in 1955. I was in the Cardinals clubhouse on Stan Musial night in the Polo grounds in 1963. I stole the home plate in the bullpen in 1965 and I saw Luis Tiant’s first game in the majors. If there is one steroid player who deserves to be in the HOF it is Bonds. He only took them because people like McQuire and Sosa were being heralded while Bonds was not getting the adulation he deserved. So I asked you about Pudge and Ortiz because they both did steroids. For my money so did Piazza and Bagwell. My friend played with Bagwell in the summer leagues for college players and Bagwell was not a HR hitter. I think Clemens was pretty much washed up before Steroids. The Red Sox had dropped him. He had lost his fastball and once you lose it you never get it back.

Fiendish Thingy

(18,528 posts)
10. No fucking way. Bonds, Canseco and McGwire nearly destroyed the sport
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 02:29 PM
Jan 2022

The only thing Bonds deserves is one giant, neon asterisk.

*

Bleacher Creature

(11,436 posts)
18. That's what I don't get either.
Tue Jan 25, 2022, 04:38 PM
Jan 2022

Ortiz is likely to get in someday, even though his name has been linked to PEDs, which is the case for Bonds and Clemens. A-Rod and McGwire both admitted to it, although A-Rod is another one who would have gotten in without them.

And where do you draw the line? For example, what would people do if Albert Pujols suddenly started taking PEDs to try and get one last year of below average hitting. Does that last year negate everything else he's done?

I'm fine with having an asterisk on his plaque and a discussion of the allegations, but it's crazy to me that Bonds isn't in.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»Column: If Barry Bonds is...